There was a long thread discussion about that a couple of years ago. It turns out there is a bite, even if the _Resident doesn't send the traity -- er, treaty -- to the Senate, or the Senate doesn't act.
The 'Rats have played this game two or three times, w/r/t LOST (Law of the Sea Cluster____) and the International Criminal Court, ee.g., deliberately binding Congress's hands just by signing a treaty that has no chance of ratification.
Dirty Harry and the NWO RiNO's will probably cooperate to rathole this treaty and keep the full Senate from rejecting it. Because once that happens, the measure is dead, dead, deader than St. Peter's doorknob.
But meanwhile, a signed but unratified treaty throws a shadow over Congress and the Courts, by preventing them from enacting anything contrary to the "spirit" of the treaty even though it hasn't been ratified. That's as close as Slick and Hussein have been able to get things worked around the way they like.
Of course, they'd prefer the U.S. be fully subjugated by the U.N., with blue helmets quartered on us and goon squads crashing into homes to strip them of weapons and/or kill the owners out of sight of CNN cameras. But they can't take us there yet.
Of course, they'd prefer the U.S. be fully subjugated by the U.N., with blue helmets quartered on us and goon squads crashing into homes to strip them of weapons and/or kill the owners out of sight of CNN cameras. But they can't take us there yet.
That's cutting to the chase all righty.
Please show support for your assertion.