Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
The few opposed cited reasons of personal safety when it comes to disgruntled co-workers.

Idiots. If your co-workers want to kill you, they don't care if it's legal to have the gun. On the other hand, if some of your co-workers want to kill you, it would be nice if some of the ones who don't were armed, wouldn't it?

5 posted on 04/03/2013 9:17:29 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Quien vive? JESUS! Y a su nombre? GLORIA! Y a su pueblo? VICTORIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

It is amazing to me that those who worship government have a near religious belief in the efficacy of laws.


6 posted on 04/03/2013 9:24:38 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Thats what I don’t get. Using their logic:

“We might have disgruntled employees who want to shoot us, so lets make sure we don’t have any guns to defend ourselves.”

So you have a workplace that doesn’t allow guns. So a disgruntled employee goes home, gets his gun and comes back firing upon defensless fish in a barrel.

See, my workplace allows carry. A disgruntled employee would never come here and start shooting because he knows it would be a suicide mission. He would be taken out before he got the first round chambered.

That explains how guns SAVE LIVES.

SEE LIBERALS? THAT IS HOW GUNS SAVE LIVES.


8 posted on 04/03/2013 10:11:49 AM PDT by envisio (Its on like Donkey Kong!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson