Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut’s Draconian Anti-Second Amendment Bill
Frontpage ^ | April 3, 2013 | Arnold Ahlert

Posted on 04/03/2013 5:38:49 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2013 5:38:49 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Look for either or BOTH CT and NY gun control laws to land up in the courts, COUNT ON IT.


2 posted on 04/03/2013 5:41:28 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Northeast is starting to resemble North Korea.


3 posted on 04/03/2013 5:42:05 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

4 posted on 04/03/2013 5:42:17 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

and CO.


5 posted on 04/03/2013 5:47:59 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

So, when some nutbag initiates another such offense, then what will they say? Like marxanista difi would say “Turn ‘em in Mr. and Mrs. America.” Don’t bloody think so. I continue to wait for one of these asshats to explain just how any of this crap will prevent nutbags from achieving their goals. It only about control and appearing that “they did something” even though the only thing they did was further restrict law abiding victims rights. I think that’ll be my new term to use. Law abiding victims.


6 posted on 04/03/2013 5:48:49 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST MR. PRESIDENT!(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I see the blue and red states starting to “part company”.


7 posted on 04/03/2013 5:51:31 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

SCOTUS confirmed 2A is an individual right (Heller) and the McDonald ruling incorporated 2A to the states.

It’far past time for a major challenge to reign in out of control states.


8 posted on 04/03/2013 5:54:00 AM PDT by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
”Nobody will be able to say that this bill is absolutely perfect, but no one will also be able to say that this bill fails the test when it comes to being the strongest in the country and the most comprehensive bill in the country, doesn't do its best to neuter the 2nd Amendment” said Connecticut Senate President Don Williams, a Democrat.

Corrected his doubletalk so that his true position can be seen.

9 posted on 04/03/2013 5:54:10 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (The Old White Flag Republicans can go straight to He// and take their pal Obama with them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“...”Nobody will be able to say that this bill is absolutely perfect, but no one will also be able to say that this bill fails the test when it comes to being the strongest in the country and the most comprehensive bill in the country,”...”

But, we can all say that it’ll work about as well as the rest of the dorky non-IQ ideas that come out of dim-bulb-crats.


10 posted on 04/03/2013 5:56:16 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

So, one person commits a crime, and the response of this state is to turn a large number of law abiding citizens into felons?

Brilliant.

maybe these newly made felons will vote smarter next time, but I somehow doubt it.


11 posted on 04/03/2013 5:58:26 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The gun owners that I know in Connecticut, all of whom would prefer to remain legal, have no intention of complying with these “laws”.


12 posted on 04/03/2013 6:08:10 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Those who currently own LCMs will be forced to register them with the DESPP by January 1, 2014 to remain legal,"

I'm glad I only have SCMs (Standard Capacity Magazines).

My Senator (Markley) and Rep. (Noujaim) assured me (by letter and phone call, respectively) that they would NOT sign onto this bill.

I'm currently working on a Blue-State exit feasibility plan.

13 posted on 04/03/2013 6:10:34 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

At what point is the RKBA infringed?


14 posted on 04/03/2013 6:12:30 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Where do criminals get guns?


15 posted on 04/03/2013 6:13:59 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
All Connecticut based gun makers should exit the state post haste and take all of their jobs with them. All Constitutional Americans should boycott Connecticut and let the state government know why.
16 posted on 04/03/2013 6:16:11 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“No gun owner will lose their gun, no gun owner will lose their magazine, they will not lose the use of said gun or magazine, so long as they follow our rules and register,” he contended.

FU Larry! The "rules" say "Shall not be infringed."

17 posted on 04/03/2013 6:17:36 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“Larry Cafero, a republican.....”

More like Larry Cafero, a gun-grabbing, left-wing, lying fake republican.


18 posted on 04/03/2013 6:21:42 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (November 4, 2008 and November 6, 2012.....Two days that will live in infamy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

If the current administration is willing to funnel guns to Mexican drug cartels in an effort to stir up anti-gun hysteria here at home, why wouldn’t it do the same domestically? Where DO those Chicago/Obama hometown animals get their firepower? And why won’t the feds prosecute gun criminals in the Windy City? I wonder...


19 posted on 04/03/2013 6:38:46 AM PDT by Basil Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

the problem is rapidly moving from abstract principles to concrete, hard reality. the decisions being faced by myself and every legal gun owner in CT (and soon to be nationwide) is whether to comply, or to resist.
and if to resist, then to what point?
does one resist when the mail arrives demanding registration?
does one resist when the police call you down to the station for arrest?
does one resist when the police arrive to confiscate based upon failure to register?
with what means?
this isn’t gonna end well.


20 posted on 04/03/2013 6:45:06 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson