Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SC's ex-Gov. Sanford clears hurdle in comeback bid
Associated Press ^ | Apr 2, 2013 10:58 PM (ET) | BRUCE SMITH

Posted on 04/02/2013 8:57:34 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW

"I want to thank my God," Sanford said. "I used to cringe when somebody would say I want to thank my God because at that point I would think this is getting uncomfortable. But once you really receive God's grace and (have) seen it reflected in others you stop and acknowledge that grace and the difference He has made in my life and in so many lives across this state and across this nation."

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gopprimary; sanford; sc2013
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last
To: DJ MacWoW
No, I do NOT agree. I don’t support Sandord and I think once again the GOP is going to throw away a winnable seat via a weak (and morally compromised) candidate.
121 posted on 04/03/2013 7:05:22 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

“Mark Sanford....the name you know.”


122 posted on 04/03/2013 7:06:54 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

So if a candidate only engaged in a little homosexuality and asked for forgiveness, and his policy positions were right, then you would support him?


123 posted on 04/03/2013 7:07:11 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Again, if it was just getting some nookie on the side that’s one thing.

This guy abandoned his post.


124 posted on 04/03/2013 7:08:16 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Maybe I wasn't clear. That's what I thought that you were saying. That tolerating any immorality is a slippery slope. I'm sorry that I wasn't more clear.

I thought that you agreed with It’s (immorality) a progressive thing. If someone gets away with a lack of principle, they just keep going.

125 posted on 04/03/2013 7:09:27 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yup. Ignorant/low information voters depend on name recognition.


126 posted on 04/03/2013 7:11:33 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; Impy
RE :”So if a candidate only engaged in a little homosexuality and asked for forgiveness, and his policy positions were right, then you would support him?”

If he came out and declared that he had a self destructive mental illness (that made him do your hypothetical), that got help and was cured and he is now engaged to a woman,
and his opposition was a lib who said that ‘marriage equality’ was a constitutional right and biblical and she wanted to give illegals the vote and ban my guns, and he was against all that,
it wouldn't be tough to choose between the two.

His having sex with a woman isnt as unnatural as if he had sex with a man.

127 posted on 04/03/2013 7:24:08 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; Impy
Look at Romney, he had a un-marred personal life history but had zero integrity on any public issues, except that cutting his taxes was good for us. that was the only one he seemed to think was golden.

That hardly made him a good candidate.

128 posted on 04/03/2013 7:32:39 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Absolutely. Beside the obvious immorality and sin of adultery (which is just as grave a sin as homosexuality according to the Bible) - his immorality had a direct impact upon the duties he was elected to perform!

He also lied about it! And far from remorseful, he is continuing his affair.

“Please forgive me for my sins, which I intent to continue as soon as I get out of here.” is not repentance, and Christian forgiveness doesn't include returning someone to the post they abandoned! You can forgive the thief who stole from your home, but not invite them back into it.

129 posted on 04/03/2013 7:36:05 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

If he was my employee, not only would I fire him on the spot, but I would do all in my power to make sure nobody else hired him.


130 posted on 04/03/2013 7:36:55 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Absolutely - but now apparently we need to fall in line and let this guy be the face of the party in South Carolina and elsewhere - because South Carolinians were in a forgiving mood and didn't think a bit of abandonment of official duties, lies, and adultery were THAT big of a deal!

I still cannot believe he asked his ex to run his campaign!

Yikes! No doubt we won't be hearing or seeing the last of bad judgment and immorality from Sanford.

131 posted on 04/03/2013 7:40:36 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; allmendream

Romney was a compromise. And you want to do it again. It does not work! Conservatives compromise and lose every time.


132 posted on 04/03/2013 7:47:52 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I have read all the comments on this thread and I couldn’t help to think back to the election bid of Romney.

Even through I was one of the people who was dead set against him as our candidate, he was chosen and we had to live with it.

In the ensuing process, the democrats/socialists used all the ‘talking points’ republicans/conservatives as their basis for the reelection of obama.

It worked and the liberal Sanford will face is probably salivating at the thought it can work again.

So carry on, the liberals are taking notes.


133 posted on 04/03/2013 7:51:57 AM PDT by RetSignman ("...a Republic if you can keep it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman

That’s their problem, not mine.


134 posted on 04/03/2013 7:53:16 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

In what way do you presume I want a compromise candidate? I wish we didn’t have a morally compromised candidate and risk losing a winnable seat. But too late now. NC GOP voters wanted to be Huckabee theologians and think forgiveness means he deserves elected office.


135 posted on 04/03/2013 7:58:32 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman

Bunk. We lose through compromise and lack of principle.


136 posted on 04/03/2013 7:59:20 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

The post that I responded to was addressed to you. I pinged you as a courtesy.


137 posted on 04/03/2013 8:00:33 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Who says you can’t have your cake and eat it too?


138 posted on 04/03/2013 8:02:44 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

My apologies.


139 posted on 04/03/2013 8:04:15 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

It’s hard to keep track. :-)


140 posted on 04/03/2013 8:07:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson