Posted on 04/01/2013 9:01:32 PM PDT by Pinkbell
There are various ways to describe the civil war rising inside the Republican Party: insiders versus outsiders, pragmatists versus true-believers, establishment versus Tea Party. Heres another: Bill OReilly conservatives versus Rush Limbaugh conservatives.
Last week, the two media titans clashed after OReilly accused opponents of gay marriage of lacking compelling argument[s] and merely thump[ing] the Bible. Limbaugh responded by saying that conservative Christians were sort of marginalized on OReillys show. On the surface, the scuffle merely reflected differing opinions about the arguments deployed last week at the Supreme Court. But in reality, it reflected a different view of conservatism itself.
OReilly is a conservative populist, which is to say, he only champions those conservative viewpoints that he believes enjoy mass appeal. His evolution on gay marriageas helpfully chronicled by New York magazines Dan Amiraillustrates the point. While OReillys own views have shifted, what has remained constant is his tendency to justify those views by reference to the popular will. In 2006 OReilly said he opposed gay marriage because it is clear that most Americans want heterosexual marriage to maintain its special place
Traditional marriage is widely seen as a social stabilizer. In 2009 he again phrased his opposition in terms of public opinion: You dont do it [pass gay marriage] particularly if people in California
dont want it, they think that the heterosexuality is a societal stabilizer. But by linking his own notions of social stability to those of the public at large, OReilly gave himself room to shift. By May of last year he was declaring that individual states should decide the question. And last week he said he supported civil unions, while on gay marriage, I dont feel that strongly about it one way or another. I think the states should do it.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
bookmark
“Legalizing pedophilia is next.”
They have already started on this campaign. All you have to do is look at the clothing ads for young boys and girls. Victoria’s Secret selling undies to pre-teens?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.