Posted on 03/31/2013 3:37:59 PM PDT by wesagain
"New reports prompt questions about perplexing security decisions after attack"
JERUSALEM – As media reports present evidence the U.S. has played a central role in arming Syrian rebels, new questions now emerge about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the controversial scheme.
The questions prompt a second look at the perplexing security decisions made by Clinton and other top Obama administration officials the night of the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on American facilities in Benghazi.
One of those key decisions reportedly delayed an investigative FBI team from arriving at the Benghazi site for 24 days. The site was widely reported to have contained classified documents.
WND raised the Thursday of whether Clinton was telling the truth when she claimed in a Senate hearing that she had no information about whether the U.S. mission in Libya was procuring or transferring weapons to Turkey and other Arab countries.
Her claim appears to contradict a New York Times report that the CIA has been aiding Arab governments and Turkey in obtaining and shipping weapons to the Syrian rebels.
The goal of the alleged weapons shipments was to arm the rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
Any training or arming of the Syrian rebels would be considered highly controversial. A major issue is the inclusion of jihadists, including al-Qaida, among the ranks of the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian opposition groups
Now a closer reading of two separate reports from the New York Times paints a picture of Clinton as the ring leader of the plan to arm Syrian rebels.
Confirming WND’s exclusive reporting for over a year, the New York Times last week reported that since early 2012.........
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“What difference does it make! I want to be the next president!”
“What difference does it make???!!”
oooooops.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
The whole thing stinks.
Nah, not likely for two reasons:
1) The NY Times said it.
2) The new boss of alkida is the POTUS.
When the Benghazi story broke, a FReeper posted here that it was about weapons falling into the hands of the Islamoterrorists and the Obama regime was somehow involved. I can’t remember who the FReeper was but he/she was right on the money.
Has anyone seen Hillary in public since the 18th? There have been rumors...
Hillary and Obama in it up to their ears.
Hillary said what difference does it make?
Well we know they were in it up to their ears, but it will make no difference. Nothing will remove Obama and Hillary has retired to her rug eating home in DC and may even run for President.
The voters who vote for Democrats just don’t care.
And I thought these commies rat basTURDS support the UN treaty against arms trade? Someone needs to pose that one to O`Bozo and his assclown circus!
Benghazi? Who cares? Guns and gays are more important, baby.
And don’t forget Twitter!
I believe “barryobi” broke the story (he gave it to powerline and FR)...links within links in the following threads. I was very interested because it reminded me of Clinton’s Serbia and so many others, in fact, as close to a template as one could get including the very same players, NGO’s etc.:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2939422/posts?page=2
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2941267/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2931033/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2939422/posts
IMO, they knowingly and deliberately armed (and paid) the Jihadi Salafists just like they did in Serbia and the socalled “genocide”.
https://mediachecker.wordpress.com/2012/09/30/the-biggest-lies-of-our-time-serbia-versus-the-new-world-order/
https://mediachecker.wordpress.com/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.