They have a logical point. There is no difference between murdering a baby who survived a batched abortion and murdering a baby in the “safety” of her mother’s womb. I simply reach the opposite conclusion from their “both are okay” position.
Planned Parenthood never seems to come to the defense of mothers who deliver then kill their children themselves.
I guess PP hates the competition and DIY ethic of some womyn.
She shouldn’t be punished with a baby. She didn’t want the damn thing. It was a parasite feeding off of her.
Perhaps if these women were tattooed so everyone would know that they are unfit mothers, the gene pool could more effectively shun them.
Also offer them sterilization. Everyone wants to see every dog and cat spayed and neutered. So why are there still so many abortions every year?
Absolutely. It’s the same person. Why is it ok to kill said person just because said person is in one location (the womb) not visible to people sans an ultrasound but not ok to kill the same person when it is in a different location (outside the womb)? It’s either ok or it isn’t. That’s why, while I find Obama’s vote against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act abominable, I do find it logically consistent. Was it evil? Was this Planned Death official’s position evil? You betcha. It was consistent, though; evil, but consistent.
They don’t have a problem sneaking woman out the back door to emergency for perforated uterus and other horrible, life-changing snafus.
They don’t regulate and the deaths from abortion are not listed as complications DUE to abortion (septic shock, fatal sepsis, which by the way, they had a huge problem with RU86 and other related drugs and sepsis as well).