Looks like the "wise latina" didn't get the memo from the White House. Still I wouldn't count on her not going along with the left wing of the court but that she dared bring up this argument is pretty amazing.
I sense a set-up. Prior to the decision on Obamacare, numerous cogent arguments against it were made. Then Roberts crapped the bed.
Keep hoping. She has played you and millions others. How much do want to bet she will vote pro-gay on this
Bump
It’s probably only a matter of time before multiple marriages are endorsed by the left in order to skate around immigration laws: Country X has 10 million adults who want to immigrate to the US. American Liberal Y colludes with those 10 million to bring them here by collecting their signatures and marrying them. Viola, now they can come over unopposed.
I;m sire you;ve heard leave it to the sttes, problem is that these people marry in MA, come to FL snd then tell everyone they;re married and want a divorce in say TX.
Stop all of this nonsense, ignore the liberaltarians who keep using the bumper sticker slogan of no Govt and keep marriage as it has for thousands of years
Ask Sonia “if woman has a right to murder the fetus living in HER belly, does she have the right to marry a man who is already married if the other woman is agreeable?.
Precedence is a bitch.
See the following chapters:
Part Fifth
Chapter II. Of the Domestic Relations -- Husband and Wife
This chapter talks about the laws of marriage, and the responsibilities of husband and wife.
This chapter talks about the responsibilities that parents have towards raising their children, and when those responsibilities end.The title page says that this book was "adapted to the purposes of instruction in families and schools."
"Marriage" was one of those things that people didn't need a definition of. This is what people taught their children about marriage and families.
-PJ
A set-up if I ever saw one.
Who would have thought that an Obama drone would question on the right side of this issue and Ted Olson would represent the wrong side?
I want a divorce from my computer & internet.
That’s an interesting question, because polygamy has been part of human tradition for as long as historical records exist, whereas gay sex and incest have been taboo for about as long a period of time.
The wise witch of the Hispanic Klan (la Raza) has great credibility among other Klan members, but not so much with American citizens.
She’s doing exactly as she’s told. She’s introducing legalizing beastiality, polygamy, incest, etc into the ruling.
The argument should be that marriage a religious issue. The Supreme Court should be debating legal issues.
2. What practical and legal restraints would their be on the enterprising business which arranged marriages of thousands of parties, so that these parties could receive some benefit of marriage? I buy heath insurance. You pay me a few bucks. We marry. You get health insurance on my family plan.
Polygamy?
What about unions between humans and animals? Are not animals just as capable of “loving” each other and people as humans?
Since people seem to no longer care about the ability to actually procreate in family units it is something of a cultural misnomer that they should care about marriage at all.
After all why should two or more people who can’t ever reproduce with each other care about an expensive and burdensome contract(union) that they will never have any children to need?
Unforutnatly due to this cultural misnomer regarding the nature and propose of marriage, the actual institution among those operating under this misnomer does not really exist. They feel they are bound by law and God to each-other for their own mutual pleasure.
But there is no need for that binding for sodomy(in the case of gays), for there can never be any children to result from that act. The same goes Zoophilia(Sex between man and animal), and ever other form of non-procreative sex.
So why on earth should any of theses pairs or groups desire the burdens of said legal & religious union? To those of us who know the parties informed the answer is entirely due to the cultural misnomer that has become of marriage.
It is an unfortunate fate that such a ancient and essencal institution as marriage should be dethroned by such a commonly pointless lie. But this is a process that has been in the workings in the west for more than 50 years, the results of which are already abundantly clear. In the legacy of high divorce rate, and broken families.
The federal court can enforce this lie thus helping to cement the word marriage in the the annals of inevitable ill-relevancy, or they can remind us that this union has a point, and should not be entered into with out that point in mind.