>> “Presenting evidence that the Earth is older than 6,000 years should win it I would think.” <<
.
If there were any, but that’s the hitch; its all imagination.
Good grief - there are trees that old.
“imagination”, maybe,
but more accurately, interpreting the evidence by assuming what you’re trying to prove.
There are at least 30 well documented different ways demonstrating it's obvious the Earth is older than 6,000 years.
Perhaps the simplest are the yearly ice layers in Antartica and Greenland - the Earth is at LEAST 160,000 years old based on that.
I find it interesting that knowledgeable people going out and actually drilling these ice cores is "imagination" and a document of unknown authorship that is 2,600 years old is no.
Well I'm not a geologist but I'm pretty sure they're on pretty solid ground when they point to evidence that indicates the earth is millions if not billions of years old rather than only a few thousand. Nothing imaginary in that.
Creationism is imagination. The half life decay of atoms and the speed of light are demonstrable real life events which are observable.