Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

We’re doomed to lose this because the judges are legislating from the bench. We should have passed a marriage amendment years back.


56 posted on 03/26/2013 12:03:49 PM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pinkbell

I originally believed they would rule in favor of gay marriage. Today’s discussion at SCOTUS on the question of standing gives me pause. I think, in this particular case, the court is looking for a way to leave this issue for The People to hash out themselves.

Justice Ginsburg, in particular, has questioned the handling of Roe v. Wade by the Court. Many experts believe that abortion laws were already changing in the states and that SCOTUS shortcut the democratic process by which laws should be passed.


57 posted on 03/26/2013 12:16:14 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

We’re doomed to lose this because the judges are legislating from the bench. We should have passed a marriage amendment years back.


Disagree. We’re doomed to lose this because few are pushing back to all the homo pop culture propaganda. The fags don’t even need activist judges anymore with the beltway GOP lying down for them. They will just put their own initiative on the ballot or get their own law written.


58 posted on 03/26/2013 12:28:49 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson