This is but one example of the difference in epistemology between a Biblical worldview and the Humanist/Satanist worldview.
The source of truth for a Christian/Jew is the Bible. God’s Word revealed to mankind.
The source of truth for a Humanist is whatever the contemporary “elite” humans want to be true.
Yes. The East Anglia e-mails and the JournoList divulgences obtained by Tucker Carlson et al. have proved now, beyond any peradventure of a doubt, what the real attitude of the Left "humanists" is toward any conception of truth.
Orwell had it right. These people are, in fact, the boot stamping on a human face forever. Some "humanism".
The upside is, now we can see them plainly. You should have heard Charlie Rose's table last night, which Charlie stacked three or four to one (counting himself as a liberal moonbat) against the solitary, embattled conservative. One of them was calling it out in the open: In future, he said, people will [be encouraged to] look back in amazement at the obviousness of "gay is okay, and if you ain't okay with it, then you ain't okay", and at the bigotry and homophobia of contemporary society. So there it is. "He who has ears ...."
Nina Totenberg was dispensing the same crap in the language of Ultimate Finality of Judgment on NPR at lunchtime. Undeterred and unschooled, btw, by the intellectual butt-whipping she just got the other day, pants down, from Charlie Kraut in Macy's storefront window.