Posted on 03/25/2013 11:45:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
“fooled him into thinking children she had through affairs were his, was awarded $40,000 in damages in February from a lawsuit he filed against her.”
Anyone care to guess what he will garner from her? Zero is already taken by me.
I’ll take $0.01, trying for second place.
Disgusting and frightening. I was raised by a woman and around a bunch of men haters. If anything, I’ve gone through life scared of women. Even with my newlywed wife, I’m afraid to have children but not because she might take me for a ride in the courts but because of what I went through as a child of a single mother.
Can’t this type of injustice be taken up to the Supreme Court level???
I mean, if the Supreme Court can take on a case relative to whether you can say the word “God” in school, surely there has to be grounds to take a case where the state can deprive of your ‘liberty’ on account of someone else’s child.
Thanks to what the favored political/regulator constituents brought to us during ‘80s and ‘90s. The great part of the default process is coming, and so are the consequences of such policies. Have fun. Enjoy the slide.
I have seen two father's lives ruined by this, where the mom/wife basically ran out of state with the kids (far away) then sued in family court and won child support AND back child support. In both cases the men didnt put up much of a real fight because they thought it was for their kids. After their lives were ruined they understood too late.
Understand, while child support was sold and defended as being the kids (watch Judge Judy), legally it is solely the Mother's money to do whatever she wishes with it just like alimony used to be.
If it means buy her new boyfriend presents or supporting him with it, then that is perfectly legal. There is no requirements on her on how the money is spent. (as long as social services is not seeing an abuse problem)
Its 100% one sided.
Get joint custody if you can, assuming she didnt flee with the kids.
Nancy Lanza received $240,000 per year in alimony from her ex and was scheduled over the course of a few more years to get nearly $300,000.
I frequently see people defend state sanctioned marriage (as opposed to or in parallel with church based marriage) on the basis that children need to be protected.
Well 80% of children are born outside of marriage anyway and the state is very efficient in seeing two people are tethered financially to a child. So seems to me no good reason to have state sanctioned marriage.
First off, the case would need to be heard at the appelate level and then be accepted by the SC...not going to happen simply because everyone knows the outcome to the question of whom is the father? “I don’t know.” So you see, it would be unfair to the tart to have to raise a child alone without someone paying and they already have one doing just that.
There really is no just way to handle these situations I guess, what would be just to the non father would be an injustice to a child and visa versa. Of course the dad could be awarded custody and the lady ordered to pay child support but what non father would want to do that i.e. raise someone else’s kid?
80% = Large fraction (not an exact number)
>>> was awarded $40,000 in damages in February from a lawsuit he filed against her
The picture is dangerously wrong in this one sentence.
The justice system is not set up to right OTHER wrongs.
like the mob too, in that its easy to get in, but near impossible to get out, even after jumpin thru all the hoops, as no part of the beauracracy knows or expects whats going on around the others in counties/state...
surprising we dont have lots of county attornys and judges getting smoked on a daily basis...
Kudos to Rachel Alexander for having the courage to write about the single largest income redistribution scheme ever devised by (wo)man.
I think the current number is about 50%, much higher among minorities.
The militant raging man-hating feminazis have the politicians on their side. They politicians are deathly afraid of feminazis.
“An honest woman would never force a man to give her money for a child that was not his, but the family law system has been set up by feminists to punish men and make women feel good about taking child support from them.”
And some wonder why men are declining to ever get married.
and a woman that can figure out how to buck the system can make SERIOUS bank.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.