for later read ........................................................................................... FRegards
Posted on 03/23/2013 9:08:57 AM PDT by Kaslin
It was a mid-afternoon operation during another “tower closure” episode.
Looking at flight operation schedules in 2013 will tell you very little about operations in the 1980s. LOL
At that time around four daily Horizon Airlines flights arrived and departed.
What nobody has explained in public or on the news to my satisfaction, is why are all these sequestration “cuts” happening? I understood, and it has been confirmed through several news reports I’ve seen, that the sequester was not actual cuts to existing spending but were a reduction in the increase in future spending for this year and some years forward. And they were insignificant reductions in the increases at that. It’s comparable to your boss telling you that you were up for a $200 a month raise and then right before the raise was to start, he tells you sorry, but he can’t afford $200 a month for your increase. But he can afford $198 a month. Not a real big disappointment is it?
So why all this hand-wringing over “cuts” that were not supposed to be cuts anyway? What’s going on, besides politics as usual?
Somebody needs to check.
My quick look at the airports is that they are mostly in Republican districts.
The cut that the FAA has is still MORE than what they had last year!!!
“My quick look at the airports is that they are mostly in Republican districts.”
I had the same thought as you. The first one on the FAA’s cut list, Dothan, Alabama, is particularly costly. The city was set to announce a major new company coming to the city. This company, apparently a major aviation player, decided to hold off on the announcement (citing safety concerns) until the FAA list was finalized. I don’t know the number of new hires this company would have generated but apparently it was a considerable number. I’ve not read or heard reactions from city officials yet.
How many of the airports affected have traffic sufficient to warrant a manned tower??
Conservatives need to lease these towers ASAP to keep them out
of the hands of the unions, if only holding a weekly cocktail party in them. If that’s possible?
The purpose is to kill people so he can then point his finger at the GOP and whine that they “have blood on their hands.”
Of course
It’s not only Barry throw up; it’s our Congress. They are letting him get away with literally murder.
The FAA needs to find $657 million in cuts due to the sequester.
President Obama granted $200 million to Jordan and $500 million to Palestine this weekend during his Mideast trip.
As a resident of the People's Socialist RepubliK of Illinois, that's exactly what the Democrat controlled state here does every time they want to raise taxes.
First to get cut is always teachers, police and fire to try and make the public scream "raise my taxes!"
Fools fall for it every time in this state, Barry's expecting the country to do the same.
for later read ........................................................................................... FRegards
The contract towers were the lowest traffic towers (level 1 of 5) when they were run by the FAA. That’s why they were contracted out. It’s not a union/non-union issue.
The choice of where the FAA is making the “cuts” IS political...to annoy the flying public and thereby try to get the Republicans blamed.
When they thanked us for it, I told them to thank Mike (ex-partner) - he's the one that can't fly right. He damned-near dumped our C177-RG into Lake Pontarchain!
I made my bones when I was a kid ......................................................................... FRegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.