Posted on 03/21/2013 4:28:46 AM PDT by God'sgrrl
Oh c’mon. Seriously?
JMEHO, but I don’t think there’s a chance Romney runs for anything again. Don’t know about Palin, and why do you say Hillary won’t run?
I may be beating around the Bush and my efforts may be PALIN next to yours, but our options so far are aPAULing.
If you don’t know the diffference between a lawyer who spent 20 years inside the beltway and a governor who rose to the top of his private sector profession then I can’t help you. Your Reagan non sequitor had nothing to do with what I wrote previously.
Romney will run because he can afford it and has that taste of feathers, that almost-got-it flavor, in his mouth.
Hillary won’t run because she’s old and sick.
I don't know. Michelle and Jim Bob Duggar got behind Santorum. If they can do it, I think most socons can.
Then again, if we don’t RUSH to judgement, we may CRUZ to victory in 2014 at least, as long as we’re not put in the short bus and sent to the SANTORUM.
(okay, a stretch, I know.....)
He’s ok with abortion for rape and incest. He’s a mixed bag on other issues as well.
Good guy. Far superior to say McCain or Romney.
But pales beside far better candidates like Sarah Palin or Rand Paul.
Santorum = Loser
He's not ok with it. He's said he would support a law which allows those exceptions.
I'm no Santorum groupie. He let us down badly in here Pennsylvnia when he supported Specter over Toomey in the primaries. But I don't think calling him wishy washy on abortion is fair.
Hillary is younger than Romney and it would be unprecedented for a party’s failed nominee to run again. (Romney actually had that taste in 2008, and I think he soured on it after 2012 anyway.)
Meanwhile, it would also be unprecedented for someone with such a commanding lead in early polls both within and beyond her party to pass on the opportunity—especially since we know it’s been her dream for decades.
I'm not ok with it. Rape and incest are horrid, why compound it by killing the child too?
No thanks.
What's more, as the runner up in 2012, he is entitled to the nomination in 2016.
Isn't that how we picked McCain and Romney?
MARK my words, even if we don’t get RICK rolled in 2014, HALEY’s comet will pass before we win again with the GOPe driving that short bus of ours. (And 2014 is looking to me like a bad SANFORD and Son sitcom rerun anyway.)
Yeah, right. He couldn’t even beat Mitt Romney — what makes him think he can beat any (other) liberal Democrat?
Rand Paul has a track record as a WINNER
Rick Santorum has a track record as a LOSER
Sorry; it's just that simple.
I bet you’d make a mad run to leftist US NEWS if you needed a view for your candidate, right?
omg...if we’re down to Sanford and Son references, all I can say is Rove “you big dummy!”
Everyone in here is pathetic. Disagree with Santorum if you like, but this party and the trashing of it’s own is in ruins. The way you all come out and rip your own candidates to shreds has turned away so many voters. That’s the problem. You don’t know a rhino from a crackhead. This isn’t called vetting, this party is made up of wishy washy conservatives all over the map who don’t know what they stand for and make it up as they go. Read the article. Nobody said you had to agree, but- wow, chill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.