I’d say that is time to have that discussion that Eric Holder suggested. We’ve pretty much failed in Looking for the minority Superman. Survival of Western Civilization demands it.
;-)
Agreed, but "Minority supermen" are not the problem -- if they really were "super" or even just your average ordinary conservative.
The real problem is Democrats keep getting away with passing off their most radical socialists under the rubric of "diversity".
So we're going to suffer under the rule of black socialists, women socialists, Hispanic socialists, gay socialists, etc., and they keep claiming it's all about "diversity".
But there's no real "diversity" in Democrat politics -- it's just different faces on the same old socialist policies.
And here's our problem: they keep telling us we need more blacks (93% Obama), Hispanics (71% Obama) and Asians (73% Obama) to vote Republican.
I'm saying: wait a minute, something wrong with this picture!
40% of whites voted for Obama.
43% of Protestants, 50% of Catholics and 69% of Jews voted Obama.
46% of married women voted Obama
47% of everyone over 40 voted Obama, and
57% of "middle income" 30k to 50k earners voted Obama.
So I'm suggesting, before we get so hot and bothered about doing "outreach" to Hispanics, blacks & other "diversity" groups, how about if we make better appeals to that 40% to 50% of our own most likely voters?