Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
That has to be the stupidest logic I’ve heard in a long, long time. Some people choose to drink arsenic so somebody forcing arsenic on me is CLEARLY not murder...

Neither does the ingestion of arsenic prove it was forced, which is exactly what her defenders are inferring.

It may not be pretty, but this is what "presumption of innocence" looks like.

201 posted on 03/19/2013 10:44:17 AM PDT by papertyger (It's only "hate" if you're conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

It does if the ingestion happens when you’re passed out.


203 posted on 03/19/2013 10:46:02 AM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger
It may not be pretty, but this is what "presumption of innocence" looks like.

Presumption of innocence till proven guilty (beyond a reasonable doubt) in a court of law.

Reasonable doubt doesn't mean shadow of a doubt. There was sexual contact. Two individuals admitted that there was. The only question is whether under Ohio law that she was able to consent. The individuals were found guilty, as I expected because that defense attorney (As shown in his strategy) did not have much to work with. Video and pictures tend to hamper this case which was quite open and shut.

221 posted on 03/19/2013 11:09:26 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (If most people were more than keyboard warriors, we might have won the election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson