The stupid party...
it’s a perfectly valid gripe. stephanopoulos hijacked an entire republican primary debate because he couldn’t get his mind out of everybody’s underpants. it was creepy.
to say nothing of what cramdy crowlady did in the general election.
Duh......yawn
Duh!!!
Why would the Democratic Party want to give up any of it’s control to the debates to the Republicans? Te Democrats, through their media arm (MSM) controls the message through the election campaign. Why share this with a GOP that has been more than willing to get snookered?
How about exerting a bit more control over who’s voting in Republican primaries? Enough with “open” primaries!! Registered republicans should be voting in Republican primaries.
I’ll accept George Stephanopoulos as an “objective journalist’ when dems accept Karl Rove as an objective journalist... Republicans have to be the stupidest party ever to grace the planet to buy into this kind of dem bullsh*it.
“And RNC chairman Reince Priebus told The Daily Caller that the party does not only want to reduce the number of debates. The RNC, he said, also wants to explore the possibility of choosing who actually asks the questions during the debates.”
A dinosaur attempting a primitve thought-process.
hey!!!! now why didnt anyone think of that before...
How about Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin
Or how about we put them 1-on-1 cage-match interview with Ann Coulter ?
First of all. The liberals own ABC, NBC and CBS so unless you want to have no exposure on those channels then you accept who they offer. Fox News could do a debate but it would not be shown on any other networks. So basically 2 million people would watch the debates and that is it. It is a gamble to not have debates on the three main networks but maybe that is what the Republicans want to do.
FU Rinse and Repeat! What a freaking concept! Did you come to this realization all on your own? How about figuring out a way to keep the Rats from rigging every election going forward, like they did in November!
There is no need for Republicans to debate each other, it merely provides fodder for the media with which to bash all Republicans.
A candidate should win on their own merits, without having to tear other Republicans down to do it.
It's NOT just Stephanopoulos - the other moderators get their questions from dem operatives. Nice long lists of questions they can 'choose' from... questions written by people who hate us.
It's about time the GOP work up to the fact that dems play us for fools.
It will be difficult for the GOP to find ‘fair and balanced’ moderators—but they should hold out for that or refuse to continue the debates.
If they set the rules for moderators/networks far in advance, it won’t matter if the liberals in the media wail and rant about the end of the debates.
Who needs them? Romney won and still lost the election.
And the GOP only now realizes this???????
The GOP should tell the Dems that they want Wayne Lapierre, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to moderate the 2016 debates. It wold be about as fair at the 3 moderators in 2012
Just now figuring this out?
As a condition of hosting a debate, the sponsoring group should be allowed to choose the moderator. Sports teams do this with broadcasters as part of their contract.
If a broadcast entity refuses to agree for any reason, the party then has the ability to explain to one and all exactly why no debate is being held on that particular network.
The fact of the matter is that the second-biggest sport for the networks, right after bashing conservatives, is bashing each other. Let CBS crow to the world about NBC’s bias. If it helps them in the ratings, they’ll stab their fellow leftists in the back in a New York minute.