Posted on 03/18/2013 11:15:27 AM PDT by neverdem
Author and MSNBC host S.E. Cupp made news in the run-up to CPAC 2013 by withdrawing as a speaker from the annual conservative confab. Her complaint against CPAC is that it would not allow pro-homosexual "marriage" organizations to sponsor the event.
Cupp identifies herself as a "proponent of gay rights," and on MSBNC she said "marriage equality" is a "major issue Republicans can no longer seem to avoid."
"CPAC's decision to sideline GOProud and Log Cabin Republicans makes me increasingly uncomfortable,"she said."Until the conference stops shaming some of its most valuable advocates, it's unfortunately not an event I can take part in."
--snip--
Masha Gessen, a lesbian and a journalist, spoke frankly about this at a conference in Sydney, Australia, last summer. "It's a no-brainer that we should have the right to marry," she said. "But I also think equally that it's a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist."
This admission "causes my brain some trouble," Gessen says, "and part of why it causes me trouble is that fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there -- because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie."
How will it change? Gessen explains: "I have three kids who have five parents, more or less. . . . I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality. And I don't think that's compatible with the institution of marriage."
"Marriage equality" becomes "marriage elasticity," with the ultimate goal of "marriage extinction."...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
LLS
Not one that God recognizes, and His is the only opinion that counts.
As with all things, follow the money...who benefits.
Government of the lawyers, by the lawyers, for the lawyers,
Society can exist nicely even if 1% are freaks
Society can still prosper even if 1 or 2% are freaks and aren’t in the closet
Society might still survive by if 1-2% are freaks and half the people think that is “okay”.
Society will grind to a halt if 1-2% are freaks and the government forces everyone to pretend its okay and normal and celebrate it.
Society will crumble when we tolerate, condone, prech, celebrate and teach children to be freaks.
Sounds to me like SE Cupp has being doing some muff-diving.
Damnation waits those that violate GOD’s laws. HE gave them to us... HIS will be done. PC will not save anyone from the fiery lake!
LLS
Revelation 20:10
"And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."
You can be fired from your job if you dont believe in samesex marriage.
That is a clear Violation of the 1st and a probably a few other amendments...
Rand is the old man up and down. Only difference is Rand tries to fool people. He does not have the integrity of the old man, because agree with him or not, the old man said what was on his mind and didn’t cave. Rand says what he thinks people want to hear.
“I have three kids who have five parents, more or less. . . .”
I’d like to hear her explain the ‘more or less’ part.
What she isn’t really saying here is what happens after marriage extinction - parental ‘nullification’ of parenting by committee. Parents vote on what the ‘policies’ are going to be, and that’s how the kid gets raised.
That’s something only a statist can love.
Sounds to me like SE Cupp has being doing some muff-diving.
So the question is, is C-Cup going to be muff diving in the short hair cut A-cups or the long haired D-cups???
Genesis 18:20-21
20. Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous
21. that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."
Genesis 19:4-7
4. Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom--both young and old--surrounded the house.
5. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."
6. Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him
7. and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing.
Isaiah 3:9 The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves.
2 Peter 2:13b Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.
Ezekiel 16:49-50
49. "`Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.
50. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.
1. But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on themselves.
2. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.
3. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.
4. For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them into gloomy dungeons to be held for judgment;
5. if he did not spare the ancient world when he brought the flood on its ungodly people, but protected Noah, a preacher of righteousness, and seven others;
6. if he condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by burning them to ashes, and made them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly;
7. and if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the filthy lives of lawless men
8. (for that righteous man, living among them day after day, was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds he saw and heard)--
9. if this is so, then the Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteous for the day of judgment, while continuing their punishment.
10. This is especially true of those who follow the corrupt desire of the sinful nature and despise authority. Bold and arrogant, these men are not afraid to slander celestial beings;
11. yet even angels, although they are stronger and more powerful, do not bring slanderous accusations against such beings in the presence of the Lord.
12. But these men blaspheme in matters they do not understand. They are like brute beasts, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed, and like beasts they too will perish.
13. They will be paid back with harm for the harm they have done. Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.
But there IS hope!!!
1 Corinthians 6:9-11
9. Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
10. nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
If you could NOT change, you would be in most pitiful shape...
Well; there was these two, one night...
Maybe two of her kids are twins.
Maybe I don’t want to go there.
I’m out of touch with the republican party.
Well, boo frickin' hoo, honey. What did you expect at a conservative conference?
And anyway, when was the last time your Prog-Rat pals sponsored a "Free Markets" table at some Dim Rat conclave?
Funny you mention lawywers ... in 2001 Evan Wolfson gave an interview in which he said over 600 gay lawyers had been working for years -- about 20 years at that point -- to get "gay marriage" </solecism> legalized by Supreme Court decree (stuffed down everyone else's throats).
And they've gone almost entirely through a judicial, rather than legislative, process.
She’s hot enough to make time with but, moraly obtuse and intellectually contrived enough to make me skip the thought of even having a drink with her....
Then again, if we found ourselves in a bar at say, around 11pm, .....things happen.
+1 but, who defines living in sin?
To my way of thinking the state has decided they are the arbitors of what the word marriage means culturally and under the law.
I think two people can be joined in a ceremony, defined by their choice and objective, outside the gay lobby.
I see it as a “We write and agree to the terms and conditions of of our union”.
I don’t understand the governments role in marriage.
+1 but, who defines living in sin?
I was using “living in sin” as a euphemism for “living together unmarried”
Really?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.