Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Warning Signs: Obama Poised for Hostile Military Takeover of U.S. – Part 2
GodFatherPolitics.com ^ | Mar 12, 2013 | byda Tagliare

Posted on 03/13/2013 5:03:56 PM PDT by wesagain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: cripplecreek

Moving people out of the doorways made the cops into accomplices to the killing of babies.

Look it up: One way to make yourself an accomplice to a crime is to remove something that is preventing the commission of the crime.


61 posted on 03/13/2013 7:06:26 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You figure there are what, 320 million in the U.S. if you figure illegals and people that didn’t get reached in the census? IF we could muster 1 million dedicated, motivated ground troops (not likely), that’s one military to 320 civilians.

The population of my county is 35,000 with about 15,000 households. That’s about 110 troops for the whole county with a square mileage of about 540, or about 1 military to 5 square miles. I estimate in this county there are at least 10,000 guns and who knows how much ammo.

None of this factors in the response of governors, national guards, police, vets, logistics, supply lines, or anything else, just sheer numbers. We one small, relatively rural county in Iowa, nothing special. A city of 3.2 million would take roughly 100,000 troops spread over who knows how many square miles.

I like to use Walmart as an example. They have nearly 1M employees in the U.S. How prominent are they in your daily life? Bet you could go weeks or months without passing one on the street. That puts things in perspective.


62 posted on 03/13/2013 7:07:44 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! [You can vote Democrat when you're dead]...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wesagain

Are they still training Saudi fighter pilots in the US? I think it was in Montana, if I remember correctly. And what about the muslim compounds in the US? And the muslims in all levels of our military and government? Remember islam is a system of government and taking over a country by murdering its citizens would be nothing new for it.


63 posted on 03/13/2013 7:16:14 PM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

“This is zero’s whole shtick - believe what I say...not what you see or know.”

It got the lying, evil, PONS elected not just once, but twice. Remember though, in 1776 a minority of the population took the lead and took war to the British...and the trigger was British attempts to disarm the Colonists. Revolutionary War I. Now, think RWII...

...after it begins, zero is fast gonna lose the shtick for it...


64 posted on 03/13/2013 7:22:33 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
I like to use Walmart as an example. They have nearly 1M employees in the U.S. How prominent are they in your daily life? Bet you could go weeks or months without passing one on the street. That puts things in perspective.

Aww Crap! FedEx and UPS are spying on me for Walmart!
65 posted on 03/13/2013 7:23:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

“He can always flee back to Africa...”

Will AFOne complete the passage? And at this point, who will pilot it?


66 posted on 03/13/2013 7:25:47 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Its interesting to note that during the revolution, a fair number of colonial military leaders had been British officers, George Washington included.

In my genealogy research I found ancestor who was some sort of colonial reservist for the British. He switched sides when the British called for the reservists to start leaving their weapons in an armory.


67 posted on 03/13/2013 7:34:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Remember the people of China didn't think the military would fire on them. Remember Tiannamen Square?

Actually the local military garrison's General balked at having his troops fire on the protesters. The Chinese brought in troops from the outer Providences to do the dirty work. The communist always relied on the peasants to do the dirty work.

68 posted on 03/13/2013 7:48:56 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“There aren’t enough military personnel to take over the USA even if you could get all of them to take part.”

They don’t need to. There are plenty of Americans willing to wear a nice pretty uniform and be a Block Captain, in charge of a single apartment complex or a neighborhood block. If they can’t control you through fear and intimidation, they can call their military overlords and have you killed. It worked in the Soviet Union, China, and Nazi Germany. It would EASILY work here, too.

Of course, those places didn’t have a pissed off population that is well trained and armed, so I suspect those block capatins would perish rather quickly.


69 posted on 03/13/2013 7:52:22 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

And the brown shirts were made up of queers and other degenerates who couldn’t get into the Wehrmacht. Hitler used them for his political purposes to terrorize the people. He had to kill Rohlm and others when they no longer became useful. Obama’s brown shirts are DHS. Obama has his own propaganda machine and mouthpieces. Obama must have read Hitler’s book.


70 posted on 03/13/2013 7:55:57 PM PDT by batterycommander (a little more rubble, a lot less trouble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wesagain

Does FR really need this kind of paranoid delusional article? Just a little research and common sense will shoot holes in the whole thing. This is EXACTLY the kind of article that outsiders look for on FR to make us all look nuts.


71 posted on 03/13/2013 7:59:52 PM PDT by conservaterian (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party, but no, if we do that the libs will win !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Some of my ancestors were Marblehead seamen...my greatx4 grandfather was a sea captain and he and another couple dozen or so with my surname fought in the Revolution. He was there when the ships were boarded and tea was dumped. We were some of the ‘minority’ then, and I count myself in that ‘minority’ number now. I do not know about their connection or not to the British...I do know about their allegiance to the USA...they were ‘we the people’...and now, we too...


72 posted on 03/13/2013 8:14:48 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: wesagain

those bullet orders are not for hard cold inventory - its basically “options” to buy over the next 5 years. It may put them first in line in any national emergency but then again, based on what the gun companies are doing denying sales to fascist states, ammo producers will probably do the same and sale only to free citizens when the time comes.


73 posted on 03/13/2013 8:25:28 PM PDT by Deathtomarxists (qucker fivepenny nine and two leaves down the plug bucket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I think I heard that during the Vietnam war, they did some figuring. In an open war we would need a 3:1 advantage in soldiers to win If it went guerrilla, we would need a 15:1 advantage. We had what, half a million troops there at one time? The VC were never too high tech, but they caused a lot of problems for our troops, and after 12 years we were gone and they were still there. The only reason I can think of for the govt buying all that ammo is to keep someone else from buying it.


74 posted on 03/13/2013 8:29:53 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I thought the Aussies were tough individualistic types, much like many posters to this thread.
Gun reform ran through them without much more than a whimper!
The real Crocodile Dundee( forgive me, his name escapes now) warned he would not relinquish his arms. The Aussie feds assured him he would, and when they came for his arms, he resisted, and he died.
Arpaio and his ilk are our front line in many ways now.

The press is Goebbels.

On which side does the popular sentiment fall?

The last two elections do not bode well.

Pray.


75 posted on 03/13/2013 8:34:19 PM PDT by magglepuss (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Just be aware the DHS is NOT the military.

Do you want to know how 'powerful' our military is? In the over 6 hours it took for the men in Benghazi to die - our military was 'unable' to help.

'Unable' - hard to believe isn't it?

Those deaths were a powerful message... to the military - to SEALS... And to citizens and the press... The story about Obama going to sleep that night was icing on the cake... Obama wanted the press to point that out - notice that NO APOLOGY WAS OFFERED. And the press didn't push for one.

76 posted on 03/13/2013 8:36:29 PM PDT by GOPJ (DHS HAS secured: 1.6 BILLION bullets - 2.700 tanks and 35,000 drones ...to use on American soil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Noob, you need not fear sunburn on your scalp...


77 posted on 03/13/2013 8:39:53 PM PDT by TXnMA (REMEMBER the Alamo! REMEMBER Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

[[If we become afraid of a bunch of faggots then we are COMPLETELY doomed as a nation.]]

Psssst- don’t ask don’t tell repealed- Schools teachign ‘alternative sex exploration’ to kids as young as 8 years old- schools banning Christian speakers while allowing filthy disgusting immoral speakers to ‘educate’ the kids at special events- boy scouts of America contemplating allowing sexual predators to serve as scout masters- girl scouts of America already allowing gay peopel to lead- on and on and on it goes- we ARE afraid of faggots-


78 posted on 03/13/2013 8:41:48 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
A city of 3.2 million would take roughly 100,000 troops spread over who knows how many square miles.

You need three to four times as many foot soldiers (real fighters, not clerks) because a soldier cannot be on duty 24/7/365. They will need relief personnel. In other words, one such city (3.2 million - nothing unusual) will consume from 30% to 50% of the fighters in the entire US Army. One large city, like NYC, cannot be even controlled by the entire US Army. Every person in the street can take a shot at the soldier, but the same soldier cannot shoot the same person as long as no weapon is visible. This imbalance, actually, requires that every citizen has around the clock watch, to make sure that he is not plotting anything. It would be hard to accomplish if you draft all men on Earth into the occupation army.

The Army can conquer the city, easily. It can demolish it in seventeen different ways, and kill every citizen fifteen times over. But that's not what they will be asked to do. They will be asked to do what any army is uniquely poorly suited for - they will be asked to do policing of an aggressive, heavily armed populace.

Still, I cannot dismiss the possibility that the Army will be involved in policing activities after a major financial crash. As soon as the USD becomes worthless paper and foreign countries stop shipping us their goodies, the populate will riot and revolt. In part it will be easy to justify, to access food stores while they last. Imagine that at 9am Obama announces that there will be no shipments of food to stores in your town, or in any other place that you can reach. What are your options? You, as an average citizen, will necessarily drop all that you are doing (who cares now?) and rush to the stores, to buy whatever you can. What will you see there, near the stores? You will see everyone else doing the same. Drop a match and get an explosion.

If such a thing happens, soldiers will be deployed. But they will be not very effective, and they will be not a major concern. They have no interest in shooting you because they themselves then become a target. Evil DHS agents may want to break some doors down, but what's the point? Will they just want to catch a bullet fired by the homeowner? Why would they do that? Their survival strategy will be very much decoupled from whatever dreams DHS has today. DHS may have lots of ammo, but they won't have enough people who are crazy enough to fire it. Those who do will instantly become walking dead. Anyone who is not brain dead at DHS will want to avoid fighting - this is the surest way to stay alive as a person. Next best way is to join the winning side. The government side cannot win because there is nothing to win; they can't kill all citizens. The people, on the other hand, can win by convincing all government agents to stop their attacks. The government then falls, but the country - and the people - will be in good shape for the next cycle of democracy.

To summarize that final thought: the DHS may have plans of military dominance, and that's why they are stockpiling war materiel. But these plans will not materialize because the plans themselves are just a wishful thinking. Too much in those plans depends on soldiers thoughtlessly shooting their own neighbors, brothers and sisters. There can't too many of those in the US Army; and those who are present are risking fragging. Soldiers are smart enough to understand that if they don't fight, nobody will die; and if they do fight, they just act as personal butchers of the dictator. Soldiers have no reason to fight, and plenty of reasons to desert. Who is going to stop them, their fellow soldiers who are also deserting?

79 posted on 03/13/2013 8:42:53 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wesagain

I’ve got four highly-trained attack cats. No one’s getting onto my property.


80 posted on 03/13/2013 8:43:34 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson