[Former Proud Canadian]

From the article:

"A key leader in the black community...who wishes to remain anonymous, bemoaned the “disturbing tendency of black electorates to not elect the smartest and brightest, or even the cleverest.

Nonetheless, he believes that there is a social contract between the northern and southern parts of the county.

“So when you allow powerful groups of citizens to opt out of a social contract, and form their own, it may benefit the group opting out, but it hurts the larger collective,” he said."

Allow me to translate. Urban black voters tend to vote for those who promise to redistribute white people's wealth to them. Nevertheless, the "social contract" requires that white people allow this to happen because if they don't it is bad for the "larger collective".

This ends one of two ways. Neither is good.

[Steely Tom]

Allow me to translate. Urban black voters tend to vote for those who promise to redistribute white people's wealth to them.

And what they get is "those who redistribute white people's wealth to themselves."

The reason was explained in a book written by Charles Murray and published in 1994.

[bert]

-----disturbing tendency of black electorates to not elect the smartest and brightest, or even the cleverest.-----

How can they say that. They elected Sinthia, even named an Atlanta boulevard after her.