Wrong.
He was there only because of Paterno's approval.
Wrong.
One word, and Paterno could have permanently gotten Sandusky banned from the Penn State campus within 5 minutes.
Wrong.
That's three strikes. You're out.
Sandusky and Paterno were not friends. They did not socialize, and Paterno did not patronize events held for The Second Mile except on apro forma basis.
Sandusky's access to Penn State was the same as any other Faculty Emeritus, and was part of his separation contract with Penn State. Paterno could no more have voided it than he could have voided Sandusky's pension.
The fact that he was STILL there after many, many rumors and allegations against him
Wow. What a despicable liar you are. There were not "many many rumors and allegations." There were two. At issue is whether Paterno himself was fully aware of a single one of them. Testimony before the grand jury indicates he was not.
Paterno did NOTHING about the sexual abuse when it was obvious something wrong was going on.
Obvious to you and other haters in hindsight, but not obvious to any actually functioning human beings at the time.
Paterno is, in my book, just as guilty as Sandusky, and BOTH should have been fired, arrested and jailed years ago.
Of course he is, because you're just another drone in a hate-obsessed lynch mob who isn't interested in the facts of the case and just wants to talk out of his posterior.
You've posted one lie after another on this thread. Why?
Hey Fred, you forgot to tell him that Canadian beer sucks.