Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 0.E.O

Your argument was that Confederates were not interested in negotiating. I proved that Virginia was willing to negotiate, but Lincoln refused.


684 posted on 03/18/2013 10:01:29 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge
Your argument was that Confederates were not interested in negotiating. I proved that Virginia was willing to negotiate, but Lincoln refused.

Negotiate with who? Nobody from the Confederacy showed up.

695 posted on 03/18/2013 1:57:14 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

To: JCBreckenridge; O.E.O
JCBreckenridge: "Your argument was that Confederates were not interested in negotiating.
I proved that Virginia was willing to negotiate, but Lincoln refused."

Neither outgoing "Dough-Faced" Democrat President Buchanan nor incoming Republican President Lincoln ever met directly with Confederate emissaries.
Neither recognized secession as lawful or the Confederacy as legitimate.

Both believed, and Lincoln said as much in his First Inaugural, that lawful secession required the approval of Congress, and so that is where any "negotiations" had to take place.

But secessionists made no efforts to negotiate or secure approval from Congress, or for that matter to address their legal issues to the United States Supreme Court.

Instead, after rejecting constitutional methods for seceding, secessionists demanded recognition by Presidents Buchanan and Lincoln, which both refused.

720 posted on 03/19/2013 4:43:23 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson