Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
JCBreckenridge: "That’s not what the electoral numbers say."

Please consider this:
In 1856, "Dough-Faced" Northern Democrat James Buchanan was elected president by winning Pennsylvania, Indiana, Illinois and California, plus every Southern state.
He immediately went to work to support the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision.

Just one more election like 1856, and one more Dred Scott type Supreme Court decision would have effectively made slavery legal in all states.
That's how close the slave-power came to victory.

But in 1860, many people who had voted for Democrats all their lives switched to other parties, because the majority Democrats had committed political suicide.
I'm saying a united, enthusiastic Democrat party in 1860 had a fighting chance to keep those "swing voters" in the Democrat fold, and win the election by carrying those same states it won in 1856.

466 posted on 03/15/2013 2:29:03 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

Not comparable whatsoever. 1856 - you had the Whig and Republican parties divided.


468 posted on 03/15/2013 8:58:23 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson