Combat=Pop tart gun
So if the BATF or some other Blue Helmet is doing a No Knock Invasion of your house and you resist????
To quote Hillary “What does it matter now?”
are drones so precise that there is no collateral damage ?
Anybody who doesn't know how these weasels think isn't qualified to deal with them.
We’re gonna need people that know how to deal with these drones.
I have noted that BO’s sickos have repeately called holder “General holder”, not “attorney general”. BARF.
What a terse, tacky, sarcastic, insulting little note from our AG. What a jerk.
The 0bama-Holder definition of ‘imminent’ was “could happen sometime maybe” so I’m not really comforted by the phrase “engaged in combat.”
In black rat speak, Waco was combat
Interesting choice of words: a combatant, not an enemy combatant. The letter does not make this distinction.
On the bright side if someone fights on the side of the regime as a combatant there is nothing in the letter that prevents them from also being the legitimate subject to drone strikes—not of course by the regime—since they will also be combatants.
The reality of all this is that if they feel they can they will do whatever they want and ignore letters, laws, and the constitution.
... Until they start to grab guns... If you resist, then you’re drone bait
A letter form Holder is worthless. It’s the POTUS that decides when and where the drones are used. He’s even bragged about this. This letter should be from Obama.
CC
The problem for Barry’s administration is that recent “signature” foreign drone strikes have been based on a redefinition of “imminent danger” so corrupted that a drone strike can be triggered by mere suspicion that certain behavior patterns of individuals or groups mirror previous precursor terrorist activity.
For this trigger-happy administration it is not at all clear what would prevent this new foreign-applied definition of (not-at-all) “imminent danger” to be applied to persons within US whether identified as US citizens or not, now that Holder has reserved to right of POTUS to strike citizens “engaged in combat” within the US.
For the foreign strikes, it isn’t necessary to ID citizens, either!