Posted on 03/07/2013 12:51:49 PM PST by jazusamo
Between August 1992 and April 1994, Clark was commander of the 1st Cavalry Division of the Armys III Corps at Fort Hood, Texas. According to a report by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the list of military personnel and equipment used at Waco included: 15 active-duty military personnel, 13 Texas National Guard personnel, nine Bradley fighting vehicles, five combat-engineer vehicles, one tank-retrieval vehicle and two M1A1 Abrams tanks. Additionally, Fort Hood reportedly was used for much of the training for the bloody attack on the Davidians and their children.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2003/10/21282/#o4F7MZBmHJZmSfHX.99
What makes ANYONE think the Feds will not use overwhelming disregard for civilian casualties to kill a single american having coffee at a coffee shop?
At Waco the Feds attacked twice, the last time with 5 Tanks and 9 Bradley Fighting Vechicles, helos, and all the snipers the FBI could find.......a drone and a missle....CHUMP CHANGE.
Shep was angry. He was almost screaming. He thought asking obama to clarify was stupid and an insult to obama.
The whole world IS a battlefield and the sooner people
realize that the better off they will be.
Walk with Krishna on the battlefield of life.
Peace is a temporary illusion.
This conflab is what the GOP gets for not having one real
leader who would cut McCain and Lindsey off at the knees
before they even thought of slamming Rand Paul. What
a shame that these clowns save their vitriole for members
of their own caucas.
My bet is that Holder’s rapid response was solely because
the public tide was just about to wash over the Obama
administration and they figured they would prevent their
own drowning by putting the issue in their rear view mirror.
Obviously McCain and his butt boy were too stupid to
figure it out. These guys are just the kind Republicans that
Democrats love because they punk so easily.
Yup
Even in war a government is limited. I am no fan of the Geneva convention for its international stance, but what part of reasonable constitutional consideration on putting a bagging limit do they not understand?
If I hear the liberals correctly then WWII is not over, I guess, or maybe they still are fighting the civil war?
What a bunch of hypocrite wussies.
Ditto and bttt.
That’s so strange because I remember how many times he brought up the 30,000 spy drones that would man our skies. He always sounded so upset (rightfully so) when he brought those up. Now that his beloved ruler was more directly questioned, I guess it’s a different story...
That old gaseous piece of shit ran for POTUS under the guise of reasonable conservatism,
and had that old piece of crap fought this hard against the Democrats
he might have had a prayer. So instead, that old senile punk has decided to attack
anybody against the Democrat machine.
My blood is boiling..
Thanks, and same to you Onyx.
WE THE PEOPLE would be a lot better off if we started the trials for treason and started hanging and imprisoning the lot of them; that includes the RINO's and useful idiots that have gone along with the insanity.
The “benchmark” leftists that I talk to are far more concerned with abuses by private business owners than they are from the government.
But, as far as I know, nothing has changed in the fact that the government can legally use deadly force to impose its will on you and a private business cannot.
Of course, that argument doesn’t ring a bell with them at all because they START from the assumption of benevolence on the part of the government.
Mine is part of it. Hurray Senator Moran.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.