Do you still plan to contribute to Rand Paul now that he made clear that he cares about the drone strike issue and not at all about Brennan’s aggressive support of the Islamofascists around the world? Does it bother you that he said he will drop the filibuster as soon as the White House tells him that it will not kill US citizens who are noncombatants on US soil?
As I said on the other thread, this is pure kabuki. I have no faith in Rand Paul.
Pat Toomey - WHen new technology comes into being - the drones - we need to know the rules of using this technology
When it comes to American soil, the staring point should be we’re not going to do that.
Paul - when people tell you American is the battlefield they are telling you your rights don’t apply. It’s incredibly important. We’ve been blaze about this drone strike business. We need to be careful and at a minimum ask can you do this with no due process?
Paul supports the Constitution . That IMO trumps all. Brennan is not mytop 50 choice for DCI, but this POTUS is not going to name anyone better so opposing the nomination and voting against it is symbolic. But defending the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that is something to support and celebrate.