No surprise here. I was posting basically the same concept right after the 2008 election. At that point, questions about his eligibility became moot. With his reelection, the eligibility issue became a non-issue.
It can still be used to ruin his legacy. I'd certainly get a lot of satisfaction if it could be proven to the country and the world that he's a fraud and a liar. Even if he couldn't be removed.
I think it is important for Historical reasons that his legitimacy always have an asterisk besides it in the History books.
Based on the research I and others have done, I am convinced that he is not a "natural born citizen" in accordance with the Understanding and Intentions of the Constitutional convention.
That subsequent legal jargon/practice obscures this point is unfortunate.