Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Could We POSSIBLY Cut the Federal Budget?
Heritage Foundation ^ | February 26, 2013 | Amy Payne

Posted on 03/04/2013 4:47:41 AM PST by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Conservatives have allowed the debate to be framed as cutting programs, instead of cutting waste.

Stop all the awards and ceremonies, stop social research grants, government advertising, sell off surplus buildings and land, allow drilling and mining with royalties to government on govt. lands, provide incentive for managers to save $ rather than spend $, repeal laws and regs that increase contracting costs, repeal Davis-Bacon, institute scientific inventory controls, make supplies conservation a factor in compnesation/promotiion.The biggest savings that would improve efficiency would be to allow managers to fire deadwood.

Eliminate EPA, DOE, TSA, FED. Combine the leftist think tank known as the CIA into the FBI. Clean the Pentagon and the rest of the military of civilian workers. There is no job a uniformed military personnel can't perform. Make tests for admission to the armed forces tougher and get females out of combat situations and then kick out all the homosexuals.

1 posted on 03/04/2013 4:47:51 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Sell the TVA


2 posted on 03/04/2013 4:50:23 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Gee: That would make sense.

I don’t look for that to happen.

Obama wants to cut the things that hurt the most people in order to make his point and have the Congress cave in to him.


3 posted on 03/04/2013 4:52:22 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Millions of jobs have been lost unnecessarily because of the EPA. Let the states do their jobs. Stop the Feds from crushing the assets of the States.

Alaska was called Seward's Folly when I was in school. Now it's an untouchable, Federal, pristine wasteland...and that's the way the Feds like it.

4 posted on 03/04/2013 4:53:35 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Where to cut? This would be a good place to start...http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/index.shtml


5 posted on 03/04/2013 4:53:35 AM PST by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

why not IPO the TVA?
same with many other departments. could be privatized.


6 posted on 03/04/2013 4:54:15 AM PST by jonose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert

Perhaps the useless House Republicans in the GOPe could quit playing small ball and defund Obama Care? They have the power to defund it, but they piss and moan over 2 cents out of a dollar in cuts while Obama transforms America! Might be a start. However as long as they are concerned with winning elections nothing will happen!


7 posted on 03/04/2013 5:02:09 AM PST by JohnD9207 (Isn't freedom worth fighting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Where Could We POSSIBLY Cut the Federal Budget?

Entitlements, both unearned (TANF, Food Stamps, Medicaid, ObamaCare) and earned (Medicaid, Social Security).

These are exactly the programs that are killing us, and exactly the programs that are EXEMPT from Sequestration.

Talk about mild reform to Social Security and Medicare around here, though, and expect a full out attack.

8 posted on 03/04/2013 5:02:18 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"Why would federal agencies cut their most vital assets instead of trimming around the edges? After all, the sequestration cuts are only 2.4 percent of federal spending.

Well, it "might" be in order to maximize the negative impact to/on voters, so that they will be more willing to vote to raise taxes. ALL levels of government are guilty of using this tactic.

9 posted on 03/04/2013 5:05:37 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Talk about mild reform to Social Security and Medicare around here, though, and expect a full out attack.

Let's talk about serious reform to welfare, food stamps, Obamacare, etc.

10 posted on 03/04/2013 5:07:21 AM PST by ladyjane (For the first time in my life I am not proud of my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
To me it is very simple. Look at the Constitution and what the federal government is Constitutionally authorized to be doing. Keep those (very few) things funded as is (for now). Then look at all the myriad of additional things the feds have gotten their fingers into and control over. Start cutting there. Not just a few percent here or there, start ending entire programs, departments, agencies, etc. Not only will you not have to cut truly vital (and Constitutionally authorized) programs, in no time you'll find yourself with a budget surplus that can be used to start paying down the debt.

I would also suggest that until these actions are done, Congress and the Executive branch - who are both failing miserably at their jobs - not be paid one cent of salary. Additionally, if these actions are not taken, that none of them are eligible for re-election, nor to hold public federal office ever again.

11 posted on 03/04/2013 5:08:06 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Clean the Pentagon and the rest of the military of civilian workers. There is no job a uniformed military personnel can't perform.

There are actually a lot of jobs that military members can't perform. The civilians are there as continuity. Military active duty personnel move around too much. Civilians typically stay at one location their whole careers. At a lot of locations the civilians are the ones that do the training and keep the mission flowing smoothly.

It sounds good to say cut civilians but that is really not such a cost effective idea. A lot of the depot work was always done by civilians. You would have to create new career fields, train and recruit to replace the civilians in these slots. This would take years to accomplish. Not really a savings.

12 posted on 03/04/2013 5:09:19 AM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Federal, pristine wasteland...and that's the way the Feds like it.

It's also prime for oil and has probably been mortgaged acre by acre to the Chinese for illegal campaign monies over the years...

Just a thought of mine...

13 posted on 03/04/2013 5:10:52 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

That list is just the tip of the iceberg. There are branches of agencies within those agencies.

For instance do we REALLY need this:

http://www.dol.gov/wb/

Funny, I don’t see a Mens Bureau but I do see a Womens Bureau.

Pathetic.


14 posted on 03/04/2013 5:18:59 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207

What you suggest has already been done, several times I believe.


15 posted on 03/04/2013 5:29:55 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I would cut the portions of the budget that pay for alternative energy. While not a cut, I would put the money spent on alternative transportation back into roads and bridges.


16 posted on 03/04/2013 5:33:25 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USAF80
Military active duty personnel move around too much. Civilians typically stay at one location their whole careers.

Milpers don't HAVE to move around so much. The civilians have about as much effect on the morale of the qualified uniforms as do homosexuals having been placed atop a pedestal as some honored species.

17 posted on 03/04/2013 5:54:44 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

You mentioned “Clean the Pentagon and the rest of the military of civilian workers.” Remember that most of those civilian workers will have to be replaced with active duty military personnel to do the jobs. The growth of civilians in the DoD was meant as a way to let the active duty military focus its manpower on the combat mission, not working daily administrative stuff in the Pentagon and other military bases. Also, it means that contractors are hired to work in the mess halls as KPs instead of detailing soldiers to do that work every day.


18 posted on 03/04/2013 5:59:47 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

You have overseas billets that have to be filled. These posts are filled by active duty. The civilian slots overseas are few and far between.

Active duty are subject to deployments. Only some civilians are deployable and it’s usually voluntary.

Your idea about the effect of civilians on morale is twisted. Civilians are a small fraction of the work force at most bases. Some bases your backbone is all civilian. Some civilians can be pains just like some military.

When an entire unit deploys, the civilians are the ones who keep the home station mission running.


19 posted on 03/04/2013 6:05:27 AM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Stop sending money to middle eastern barbarian savage countries.


20 posted on 03/04/2013 6:10:26 AM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson