[BillyBoy]

The headline mentions gays, but the article is 90% about Christie. Did CPAC quit extending an invitation to GOProud and the Log Cabin Republicans (I thought most of them became GOProud, but apparently they're still around) That's what the article implies, but doesn't make clear.

I've given up on CPAC some time ago. FR was right to boycott them in 2011 over the gay flap, I'm not sure why they got favorable coverage here in 2012 because the issue hadn't gone away.

CPAC overall has become too libertarian and Ron Paul friendly for my tastes. They're supposed to be CPAC, not LPAC. As someone else noted, I don't have a problem with "gays", if a "gay conservative" wants to attend CPAC, more the power to him. I DO have a problem with "gay activists", however. If your organization wants to push for gay marriage, gays in the military, etc., find another venue to do it. I'm not drinking the kool-aid that that's a "true conservative" position.

[lentulusgracchus]

CPAC overall has become too libertarian and Ron Paul friendly for my tastes.

RP isn't the problem. Rove is. And whoever runs him.

[sickoflibs]

There is one self identified libertarian babe I love watching,
Michelle Fields is guest on Cavuto every Friday for segment on government spending stories,
Today they were on the Chicago public schools teaching sex Ed to kids.
She really ripped the public schools pointing out how
they are wasting taxpayers money on sex ed when the kids reading and math proficiency is only about 17%.

She said the purpose of public schools is to make public school teacher’s lives better while ruining the kids lives by making them useless, WOW.

Her being young and cute helps too, she is far better looking than the Paul’s.

I am sympathetic to libertarianism in one respect.
No more costly useless land wars. Bush/McCain/Cheney cured me of that foolishness.