I believe the law is what it says. Or do you think it's all just open to semantic interpretation? What law was broken here?
IMO that isn't the point or the issue here at all.
That wasn't what I was getting at. I'm talking about standards, morality and principle here. Using the example of the 1st Amendment of what is right and should be exemplified.
And Obama’s using the bully pulpit in an attempt to intimidate a member of the press. But when did he ever care about principle?