Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Corporate Democrat
Perhaps channeling some of his Daddy’s Jew-hatred?
I expected more from Paul.
2 posted on
02/26/2013 3:32:45 PM PST by
TheThirdRuffian
(RINOS like Romney, McCain, Dole are sure losers. No more!)
To: Corporate Democrat
Rand voted yes because his Dad’s libertarian anti-Israel fan club was upset. Hating Israel is a defining issue for these people.
To: Corporate Democrat
I failed to understand his reasoning. Seemed to me Paul just makes his decision based on totally random illogic.
Yes, the president gets to pick appointees, but that doesn’t mean president IS OUR KING, and the confirmation process a rubber stamp to make it look pretty.
Huh, again????
4 posted on
02/26/2013 3:35:50 PM PST by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Corporate Democrat
Hell, even pasty blue bloods Cornyn and McCain voted Nay against one of their own. Rand Paul voted Yea?! WTF!!!
5 posted on
02/26/2013 3:36:22 PM PST by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Corporate Democrat
What ever the reason he is done for me. The fork stuck.
6 posted on
02/26/2013 3:37:20 PM PST by
Ramonne
To: Corporate Democrat
Asked if he ever got the information he wanted about Hagel, Paul said that he hadn't. WTF
To: Corporate Democrat
May the price of rope rise sharply in DC very soon.
I see you’re new.
Are here to rub salt in our wounds?
9 posted on
02/26/2013 3:38:46 PM PST by
right way right
(What's it gonna take?)
To: Corporate Democrat
I had better hopes for young Paul.
Alas, it was not to be.
If he can’t even vote correctly on something this obvious....a simple vote — not requiring any leadership ability or effort....
pray for America! pray pray pray...
(and yes, we need a new Senator next time, too!!!)
To: Corporate Democrat
That statement from Rand Paul is less than weak tea, it is nonsensical. It makes him sound like he completely defers to Lord Obama and it will haunt him with conservatives should he have any higher office aspirations.
11 posted on
02/26/2013 3:41:26 PM PST by
Truth29
To: Corporate Democrat
Rand, You have lost my trust...Betrayed again
12 posted on
02/26/2013 3:42:38 PM PST by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Corporate Democrat
Covering mouth and coughing - bullshit!
It was no surprise to me at all. I told y’all so a long time ago.
16 posted on
02/26/2013 3:44:43 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: Corporate Democrat
Like father, like son..Ron Paul taught his son well..I guess hating Jews is the new “In” thing..but hey no worries Rand, Louis Farrakhan endorsed Hagel first so your in good company
To: Corporate Democrat
He found
this in his driveeway with the pink slip tucked under the windshield wiper?
19 posted on
02/26/2013 3:46:23 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Corporate Democrat
but the president gets to choose political appointees," Paul said. So what's the point of the review? This is an obvious cop-out.
Rand is now off my A-list. I'm on the Cruz bandwagon.
To: Corporate Democrat
Why did we expect any differently?
Another phoney baloney politician. I’d really like to know what he and the others were promised. Or were they threatened?
To: Corporate Democrat
So, I guess that leaves Ted Cruz as the last Conservative in the Senate?
23 posted on
02/26/2013 3:47:26 PM PST by
manic4organic
(It was nice knowing you, America.)
To: Corporate Democrat
Meno to Rand:
FU*K YOU RINO
27 posted on
02/26/2013 3:50:07 PM PST by
deport
To: Corporate Democrat
don’t trust any of these guys, period
32 posted on
02/26/2013 3:52:55 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson