Skip to comments.
Why was Michelle Obama at the Oscars?
The Washington Post ^
| 2-25-13
| Jennifer Rubin
Posted on 02/25/2013 10:23:15 AM PST by 444Flyer
Edited on 02/25/2013 10:24:48 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
It was the average too-long, unfunny, over-produced Academy Awards TV show and then, after suffering through the 10-hour (well, it seemed like it) show, there was the first lady. In a ball gown. With military service personnel in dress uniform behind her.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: flotusmichelle; hollywood; oscars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
The Obama's, using our military like set decorations.
1
posted on
02/25/2013 10:23:20 AM PST
by
444Flyer
To: 444Flyer
I can only imagine the outrage if Laura Bush had ever done something like this.
2
posted on
02/25/2013 10:24:49 AM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
3
posted on
02/25/2013 10:25:48 AM PST
by
444Flyer
(Obama killed the Twinkie, but not the Terrorists in Benghazi. What's wrong with this picture?)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Laura is too classy to be on something as debauched as the Oscars. Michelle Antoinette, on the other hand......
4
posted on
02/25/2013 10:28:56 AM PST
by
clintonh8r
(Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Laura Bush didn't see the WH as her personal ‘trademark’ for self-aggrandizement.
5
posted on
02/25/2013 10:33:11 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: clintonh8r
Shouldn’t the Worst Lady (mooch-elle), the equal-opportunity, affirmative-action grifter loser be in a prison cell? What a shameless, classless, large-posteriored loser.
6
posted on
02/25/2013 10:33:35 AM PST
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: 444Flyer
Why was Michelle Obama at the Oscars?Because the Obamas are more concerned about being celebrities than they are about leading the country.
To: 444Flyer
Because they’re still in campaign mode...
To: 444Flyer
Strange to see her without pads and helmet...one of the best in history at OG.
9
posted on
02/25/2013 10:40:24 AM PST
by
JPG
(Stay strong.)
To: 444Flyer
10
posted on
02/25/2013 10:44:49 AM PST
by
BBell
(And Now for Something Completely Different)
To: GreenHornet
She had a global audience of how many people? She chose promoting homosexuality in her little speech with some of our military standing in the background with forced smiles on some of their faces. The whole thing is Peronish.
11
posted on
02/25/2013 10:46:49 AM PST
by
444Flyer
(Obama killed the Twinkie, but not the Terrorists in Benghazi. What's wrong with this picture?)
To: 444Flyer
Glad I didn't watch I'm really tired of this piece of garbage.
To: 444Flyer
The background props were there for a purpose. The young military members in the background were put there to make a statement that the military is solid behind Obama. Far from the truth.
Fake and phoney....just like the Hollywoood crowd.
To: 444Flyer
The Obama’s are determined to take full advantage of their positions for celebrity golf trips, lavish vacations and now the Academy Awards and don't want to be bothered with the minutia of the job, like protecting the lives of American embassy staff under attack overseas.
14
posted on
02/25/2013 10:50:40 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: 444Flyer
This is nothing more than advertising. They are using every free and government paid opportunity they can to advertise the obama brand. This is opportunistic and degrading to the office of the President. It is nothing more than a continuation of the massive propaganda that obama deploys by using every opportunity they can create or infuse themselves in.
This is just wrong.
To: Mr. Jeeves
I can only imagine the outrage if Laura Bush had ever done something like this. Even better...what if Nancy Reagan had done it!
16
posted on
02/25/2013 10:51:55 AM PST
by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
To: 444Flyer
Was Star Wars getting an award? If not, why did they have a guy in a Wookie costume there?
17
posted on
02/25/2013 10:52:40 AM PST
by
History Repeats
(sic transit gloria mundi)
To: GreenHornet
Just wait until ( I can hardly wait myself ) they are no longer residents of the WH!
There won't be enough band width in the universe to accommodate their combined egos!
18
posted on
02/25/2013 10:55:16 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: 444Flyer
I am so very pleased that I don’t have smellelevision.
I have seen some very beautiful, intelligent, exciting, sexy, big hearted and talented Black women/ladies....but that ugly ghetto-rat sure isn’t one of them.
If a guy had a 1972 Ford Pinto and put a fortune into it, trying to make it look like a Bentley, it would still be a 1972 Ford Pinto.... looks bad, too much road noise, embarrassing to even be around and cost far more than it’s worth. Fact is, if that thing was hit from the rear, it would likely explode into a ball of fire.
I actually find her very disgusting.... in every way.
19
posted on
02/25/2013 10:55:21 AM PST
by
Gator113
( REGISTER THE DAMN LIBERALS and leave my guns alone!!)
To: 444Flyer
Because they thought Django was going to win best picture and she would get to present the award.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson