Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All the Coal, None of the Carbon- Almost
Townhall.com ^ | February 25, 2013 | Bob Beauprez

Posted on 02/25/2013 6:59:06 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2013 6:59:08 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If nothing else, coal to oil can be processed with natural gas. Heavy hydrocarbon plus light hydrocarbon equals oil. South Africa has been doing this for years. Germany did something similar during the war.

Until recently natural gas was too expensive, but now producers would love to expand the market.


2 posted on 02/25/2013 7:21:23 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

Coal to liquids is not the same as claiming it is coal to oil. They don’t make oil. They make fuels likes kerosene, diesel, etc.


3 posted on 02/25/2013 7:23:35 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

COAL IS SOALR ENERGY!

You heard it here first:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2988229/posts


4 posted on 02/25/2013 7:24:15 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What would be great is to locate a coal processing plant like this right next door to large greenhouse facility.

Pump that CO2 into the greenhouses - it’s plant food after all...


5 posted on 02/25/2013 7:30:33 AM PST by chrisser (Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The author misses the point that carbon dioxide is just an excuse. What they left truly hates is not CO2, but generated energy. And industrialization. And machines, modernity, concrete and refined metal.

What they truly want is the simplicity of primitivism, at least for everyone but themselves. They would be content to have all the benefits of a noble class, ruling over the rest of us as agrarian peasants.

Look at Al Gore, living in a ghastly mansion that consumes enormous amounts of energy, flying about in private jets, driving SUV limousines. etc., ad nauseum. Yet he is filled with sanctimony about how everyone else needs to do with less, be hotter in summer and colder in winter; drive slow and unsafe economy cars with weak engines; not fly at all, etc.

He is a terrible hypocrite, if not to his “nouveau elite” sensibilities; but he is not unique from his peers, other than “winning life’s lottery”, a fortune that he despises in others.

But while Al Gore is cynical beyond belief, the fanatical second tier of his followers are true believers in their faith of agrarian primitivism. People like Earth First! and PETA, who are motivated public pests, funded by elitist pigs like Al and “Ter-ay-sa” Heinz, wife of that lurching fop, the treacherous and cowardly John Kerry.


6 posted on 02/25/2013 7:43:31 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If scientists succeed in eliminating CO2 emissions, the plants aren’t going to like it.


7 posted on 02/25/2013 7:43:51 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I hate the idea that anyone is accepting the premise that CO2 is a pollutant and something to be avoided “emitting”.

The earth’s systems buffer and account for fluxuations in atmospheric CO2 quite handily without our interference.


8 posted on 02/25/2013 7:50:19 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

They hate energy, cheap energy, for what reason?

Because it allows the “commoners” to enjoy lifestyles that only the elite “should” enjoy.


9 posted on 02/25/2013 7:51:23 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

It shows you how clueless the left is


10 posted on 02/25/2013 7:53:07 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Diesel is not made from Coal


11 posted on 02/25/2013 7:57:57 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The sheeperals just want to feel good about themselves for “saving the erf”.

They don’t really care whether there is an actual threat,
or whether their supported policies actually will do anything to alleviate that threat.


12 posted on 02/25/2013 7:58:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney
They don’t make oil. They make fuels likes kerosene, diesel, etc.

Do you have a "per barrel" estimate of the cost of this process?

13 posted on 02/25/2013 8:06:16 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be "protected" by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

None of the above bullcrap add-ons come free. They must make coal burning for electric 2-4 times as expensive. Thus making it non-competitive with natural gas etc. But what do the above researchers care? They got paid for meaningless global warming related research that cannot be deployed on an economic basis in the real world


14 posted on 02/25/2013 8:06:22 AM PST by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing --- Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The good professor should next direct his efforts to extracting energy from human and animal solid waste products.

Then we will get to see what happens when Fan hits the ...


15 posted on 02/25/2013 8:08:41 AM PST by Dr. Sivana ("C'est la vie" say the old folks, it goes to show you never can tell. -- Chuck Berry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
They must make coal burning for electric 2-4 times as expensive.

While you are right about natural gas for power plants, I think what he's trying to do is to make fuel oil and diesel, which might be more economic. A liquid fuel has considerably more energy density than natural gas in transportation uses.

16 posted on 02/25/2013 8:09:28 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be "protected" by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Would have been nice if the story had given even an inkling as to how they extract the energy without burning it.


17 posted on 02/25/2013 8:11:50 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The environ-Wackos will find something wrong if it!!!


18 posted on 02/25/2013 8:23:39 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen
The environ-Wackos will find something wrong if it!!!

Correct. Even if they can get the emissions down to zero the wackos would then be crying about the mining processes.

19 posted on 02/25/2013 8:45:20 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks like Right-Wing extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Diesel is not made from Coal

Clean Diesel from Coal
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/405676/clean-diesel-from-coal/

Synthetic diesel fuel from coal
http://www.energyandclimate.org/synthetic-diesel.html

Gasoline alternative: Synthetic diesel heralds a new era for coal
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/780377ac-1dd2-11e2-8e1d-00144feabdc0.html

It is not a new process. Germany did it to supplement fuel supplies back during WW2.

Diesel Production from Fischer−Tropsch: The Past, the Present, and New Concepts
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef900064c

20 posted on 02/25/2013 9:03:37 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson