Skip to comments.
Man charged with felony in Obama mural defacing
Houston Chronicle ^
| 2/23/13
| Carol Cristian
Posted on 02/23/2013 9:21:46 AM PST by OKRA2012
A suspect has been charged in a recent defacing of a mural of President Barack Obama near a popular midtown restaurant.
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: houston; obama; vandalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Voir Dire would be fun in this case.
1
posted on
02/23/2013 9:21:55 AM PST
by
OKRA2012
To: OKRA2012
To: OKRA2012
3
posted on
02/23/2013 9:24:03 AM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: Larry Lucido
4
posted on
02/23/2013 9:24:22 AM PST
by
OKRA2012
To: OKRA2012
In other news. zer0 regime praises Taliban who destroyed giant Buddha statues.
5
posted on
02/23/2013 9:27:10 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: OKRA2012
The links to the story are not working, but I will inject my opinion:
That "man" was not defacing Zero's portrait but merely expressing his artistic freedom.
6
posted on
02/23/2013 9:27:55 AM PST
by
Minutemen
("It's a Religion of Peace")
To: OKRA2012
He should spread s**t on it and call it art.
He could name it “Feces on Crap”.
7
posted on
02/23/2013 9:29:17 AM PST
by
Da Coyote
To: OKRA2012
They’ll upgrade charge to include blasphemy.
8
posted on
02/23/2013 9:30:51 AM PST
by
glennaro
To: OKRA2012
Whatever happened to the guy who defaced that Chick-Fil-A? Oh yeah, I remember. The charge was dropped.
To: OKRA2012
It’s not a mural, it’s a political ad that’s past its time. And I doubt whether it’s worth very much, since a bunch of volunteers helped to repaint it. Ergo, not a Picasso.
I seriously doubt whether this would be treated as a felony if this were an old campaign poster of George Bush.
10
posted on
02/23/2013 9:32:39 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: OKRA2012
11
posted on
02/23/2013 9:32:53 AM PST
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: OKRA2012
It’s not a mural, it’s a political ad that’s past its time. And I doubt whether it’s worth very much, since a bunch of volunteers helped to repaint it. Ergo, not a Picasso.
I seriously doubt whether this would be treated as a felony if this were an old campaign poster of George Bush.
12
posted on
02/23/2013 9:33:09 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: OKRA2012
Why shouldn’t there be a felony charge here?
Saddam Hussein wouldn’t put up with it, Jung-un would do something, same with Ma0, Castro and Stalin. likewise, Same with Ø’.
13
posted on
02/23/2013 9:33:34 AM PST
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: OKRA2012
"It was the second act of vandalism against the mural"... "Vandalism against the mural"? I think not...LOL!
14
posted on
02/23/2013 9:34:04 AM PST
by
Minutemen
("It's a Religion of Peace")
To: OKRA2012
If we were talking about a likeness of Mao Tse Tung having been added no criminal charges could have been lodged because Mao was obviously one of Osama Obama’s mentors...along with Saul Alinsky,Bill Ayers and “Reverend” Wright.The accuracy of Mao's image being added would have made the act one of free expression rather than “vandalism”.
15
posted on
02/23/2013 9:35:41 AM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
To: Minutemen
Freedom of speech? Does America really need ‘larger than life’ portraits of presidents al la Cuba, Argentina, North Korea....all pre WWII fascists dictators.....NO WE DON’T.... No No No Obama....
16
posted on
02/23/2013 9:36:15 AM PST
by
yoe
To: Cicero
For the prosecution, the issue will simply be an issue of criminal mischief in the destruction of private property. No different than someone going to property that you own and committing vandalism.
17
posted on
02/23/2013 9:38:13 AM PST
by
OKRA2012
To: OKRA2012
"Davis has a permit to carry a gun and says that by carrying the gun, it sends a message that just because people disagree with each other, they don't' have to resort to acts that will do harm."
Doesn't the owner know that is an assault rifle he's carrying -- and the supreme one doesn't like that! Funny how this is okay because it goes with something the liberals support - but bad for the rest of us...
18
posted on
02/23/2013 9:39:18 AM PST
by
BCW
(http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
To: Minutemen
Jeeze—has the US of A gone completely mad? When did we make “defacing” a campaign poster a crime—especially a felony?
Freedom of speech is, as I recall, the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
19
posted on
02/23/2013 9:39:27 AM PST
by
basil
(basil, 2ASisters.org)
To: glennaro
In accord with the Obama law, his head will be removed.
20
posted on
02/23/2013 9:39:49 AM PST
by
ANGGAPO
(Layte Gulf Beach Club)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson