Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Youthful Solar System Bodies Puzzle Evolutionary Scientists (article)
Institute for Creation Research ^ | Article posted on February 13, 2013. | Jake Hebert, Ph.D,

Posted on 02/15/2013 12:08:09 PM PST by fishtank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: fishtank
Likewise, the extreme volcanic activity on Jupiter's moon Io seems incapable of being sustained for extremely long periods of time.

Io is frictionally heated by the gravitational changes of its elliptical orbit close to massive Jupiter; that energy never "runs out."

This author is either an idiot or a liar. Probably some combination of the two.

21 posted on 02/15/2013 12:52:05 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui
6. The sun (and all stars) are electrical arc discharges not H-bombs

You are kookier than the original poster.

Of course electric and magnetic fields are important on the sun. But easily-made spectroscopic measurements (e.g., extinction of Lyman-Alpha lines) can confirm that there is fusion going on in the core of the sun.

Begone, kook.

22 posted on 02/15/2013 12:55:01 PM PST by backwoods-engineer ("Remember: Evil exists because good men don't kill the gov officials committing it." -- K. Hoffmann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I’m sure that it puzzles priests, doctors, welders and cab drivers too. What the in bloody heck do “evolutionary scientists” have to do with astronomy? Evolutionary scientists would be ones who study evolution, right? Evolution only deals with the diversity of life on earth. Evolutionary scientists would have no great expertise on the age of objects in the solar system, at least not any more than anyone else.


23 posted on 02/15/2013 12:55:23 PM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
I think she’s saying the same thing about you. :0)

LOL - Maybe.
Though I will admit to not knowing/recognizing a lot of celebrities.

24 posted on 02/15/2013 12:55:58 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
What if the earth is 6,000years old and the rest of the universe is Billions of years old....

Blame the mice!

25 posted on 02/15/2013 12:56:36 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui; KC_Lion
Mainstream astronomers are going to learn some new stuff that heretic astronomers have been hooting about for ages:

1. Saturn’s rings are recent

2. Io’s eruptions are electrical discharges

3. The sun (and all stars) is the remnant of a galactic Birkland current Z pinch

4. Big Bang, Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Black Hole are mathematical hallucinations.

5. Almost all life was wiped out in North America 10,000 years ago by a comet impact

6. The sun (and all stars) are electrical arc discharges not H-bombs

7. 99% of all matter in the Universe is in the plasma state and hence is electrical in nature

8. The “solar wind” would be more aptly named the solar electric current

9. Radiometric dating is heavily skewed in the presence of static electrical fields thus all geological and archaeological dating relying on isotope decay is unreliable.

10. Gravity has an electrical component

www.thunderbolts.info

And this is the source of all that electricity!!!!


26 posted on 02/15/2013 12:57:06 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stremba

Ah... you would think so...

but perhaps that’s not their focus.

Perhaps their focus is more... religious?


27 posted on 02/15/2013 12:58:52 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Kevlar umbrellas for the Russians. Now there’s a money maker but remember you heard it here first.


28 posted on 02/15/2013 12:59:43 PM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

“The brightness of Saturn’s rings is puzzling because after billions of years, they should have been darkened by dust from comets and asteroids. Yet these rings are still brilliantly beautiful.”

Are these people really this stupid? The moon is covered in dust and last I checked it reflects light just fine. Where in “God’s plan” does it indicate that dust is flat black? Stuff like this just makes creationists look stupid. My God did create the universe but he is not a Luddite. When “creation science” beliefs are so clearly ignorant it makes it easier for people to doubt other religious teachings and thought. People like this are truly doing Satan’s PR work.


29 posted on 02/15/2013 1:01:34 PM PST by azcap (Who is John Galt ? www.conservativeshirts.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

“The brightness of Saturn’s rings is puzzling because after billions of years, they should have been darkened by dust from comets and asteroids. Yet these rings are still brilliantly beautiful.”

Are these people really this stupid? The moon is covered in dust and last I checked it reflects light just fine. Where in “God’s plan” does it indicate that dust is flat black? Stuff like this just makes creationists look stupid. My God did create the universe but he is not a Luddite. When “creation science” beliefs are so clearly ignorant it makes it easier for people to doubt other religious teachings and thought. People like this are truly doing Satan’s PR work.


30 posted on 02/15/2013 1:01:52 PM PST by azcap (Who is John Galt ? www.conservativeshirts.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stremba
I’m sure that it puzzles priests, doctors, welders and cab drivers too. What the in bloody heck do “evolutionary scientists” have to do with astronomy? Evolutionary scientists would be ones who study evolution, right? Evolution only deals with the diversity of life on earth. Evolutionary scientists would have no great expertise on the age of objects in the solar system, at least not any more than anyone else.

Notwithstanding the scenario where an evolutionary scientist was married to an astronomer; might make for some interesting pillow talk. :-)

Kidding aside, I think it would be productive for experts in such disparate disciplines to collaborate on that kind of an endeavor.

31 posted on 02/15/2013 1:03:36 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Those GIFS ARE GREAT!


32 posted on 02/15/2013 1:07:16 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Maybe you’re actually in a lab with lots of wires running into your brain simulating reality. By pressing this secret button you will be directed to make a response.


33 posted on 02/15/2013 1:13:37 PM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Io is frictionally heated by the gravitational changes of its elliptical orbit close to massive Jupiter; that energy never "runs out."

There is no such thing as perpetual motion. The energy has to come from somewhere. In this particular case, I vote Jupiter. I would imagine it could probably be calculated how much rotational energy Io steals from Jupiter with each orbit.

34 posted on 02/15/2013 1:22:21 PM PST by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Not really. All you have to do is ask is why is start light, from the galaxies in our LOCAL GROUP, taking MILLIONS of years to reach us.

As soon as you hear the “answers” coming from Jake and his friends, you will know that this has nothing to do with Astronomy.


35 posted on 02/15/2013 1:28:35 PM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Maybe you’re actually in a lab with lots of wires running into your brain simulating reality. By pressing this secret button you will be directed to make a response.

I keep pressing the button and NOTHING happens...

Unless that is what was supposed to happen....

Time to go back loooking at my belly button.....


36 posted on 02/15/2013 1:35:46 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Correct, there is no perpetual motion. But a couple billions years of gravity induced friction goes a LONG way.


37 posted on 02/15/2013 1:42:37 PM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

The article says “should .... yet” a lot. Shows the muddy thinking that has become common.
The universe “should” not do anything. The universe does what it does, and it’s up to us mortals to figure it out - but we don’t seem to be doing a very good job of it.

There are no anomalies in the universe. The universe is working quite well the way it always has.


38 posted on 02/15/2013 2:11:03 PM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee; metmom
But people claiming the earth is 6,000 years old and throwing up their arms every time they find a gap in the data and saying "God did it." is not science. Idiocy, yes, but not science.

And people claiming that the earth is millions of years old from data they can't repeat is religion; you can't "prove" either theory. And the question is, "How did God do it?" not "It happened from nothing."

39 posted on 02/15/2013 3:31:50 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee; metmom
But people claiming the earth is 6,000 years old and throwing up their arms every time they find a gap in the data and saying "God did it." is not science. Idiocy, yes, but not science.

And people claiming that the earth is millions of years old from data they can't repeat is religion; you can't "prove" either theory. And the question is, "How did God do it?" not "It happened from nothing."

40 posted on 02/15/2013 3:32:16 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson