“You may continue to declare yourself the sole arbitrator of the truth, but the FACT is you have yet to provide any substantiation for your assertions.”
Sure, I have. You simply disagree.
“Fremont started the race really well, but since he never crossed the finish line your conclusion his situation has any bearing on the Original definition of natural-born is flawed.”
By that logic, applying your argument to Rubio is invalid and irrelevant, since he is not President.
LOL! Then by you logic, your defense of his eligibility is 'irrelevant' as well.
STILL waiting for you to provide a historical source for your conclusion, BTW.
Pardon my bluntness, but I've had enough 'You're wrong because I say so' arguments to last me a lifetime. It's like trying to have a rational debate with a 2 year old.