LOL! Then by you logic, your defense of his eligibility is 'irrelevant' as well.
STILL waiting for you to provide a historical source for your conclusion, BTW.
Pardon my bluntness, but I've had enough 'You're wrong because I say so' arguments to last me a lifetime. It's like trying to have a rational debate with a 2 year old.
Apparently, you haven’t followed the entire thread.
My evidence is the Constitution, Section II, Article I, I believe.