Posted on 02/14/2013 6:21:43 AM PST by KeyLargo
Edited on 02/14/2013 9:25:10 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
He could have come out with his hands up...he chose to burn...or shot himself more than likely.
So is Game and Fish. Why was the FBI there HR?
No, you did and it makes you look pitiful.
Or he could have been wounded and could not respond.
Why didn't you?
Not my jurisdiction
So is Game and Fish what? If the FBI was there, why don't you ask them why?
Really? Is that why they have different names? Golly. I'd neverhavethunkit.
What first-hand knowledge do you have of any of this?
BTW, Nice clip of the question "Was that the fear of getting shot, or the fear that Dorner actually had some evidence that could blow some corrupt police out of the water? "
you didn't answer the (admittedly rhetorical) question, but that didn't stop you from butchering it into a statement. You could work for MSNBC, gee you're good.
If you routinely chop stuff up to suit your worldview, then I can fully understand your absence of understanding of Constitutional principle.
Audio of tape. Not that I give a damn, but fire was no accident. How Dormer became a crispy critter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCdqybEfy9w&feature=youtu.be
You seem to be lacking in the areas of authority.
Lets get one thing straight, Dorner is dead and that is a good thing. The police in this effort overstepped many bounds and rules to get this done.
Many departments were involved and also broke rules to eliminate this individual.
I do not understand what you are defending or attacking at this point. A small paragraph explaining your position would be most helpful.
Yes, really. You post like LAPD has jurisdiction over the entire area of SoCal.
What first-hand knowledge do you have of any of this?
First hand? I wasn't present if that's what you mean. How about you?
you didn't answer the (admittedly rhetorical) question,
Why would I waste my time?
If you routinely chop stuff up
As opposed to posing mindless, asinine rhetorical questions? Get back to me when you have a clue.
Please...
Work on that paragraph, I have to be in Savannah in the morning.
Who appointed you judge, prosecutor and jury. The police is inclusive.
Many departments were involved and also broke rules to eliminate this individual.
The FBI? When was there a judicial hearing that came to that conclusion?
I do not understand
That has become all too obvious. Go back and answer the questions posed to you.
I didn’t kill him.
You absolutely make no sense. Go back home HR
FBI was all over the place.
Once Again, You make no sense
No plane crashed into that building so it’s obviously controlled demolition. /s
Who claimed you did, psycho?
Here’s my clue. Regardless of what I type, you will butcher it so your comments look almost intelligent. Bye.
How are things in NoDak?
You cannot reason with some people. I agree with you that the police tactics were questionable and that saying so does not automatically make one a “dorner supporter” by any means. Fact is, the police think they are above the law these days. They wanted revenge, not a bad guy brought out in cuffs. We are supposed to be a civilized country. What gives these men the right to be judge, jury and executioner? Not sad that he’s dead but it just seems wrong the way they achieved it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.