Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg
I am glad we have a 1st Amendment to protect us against this silliness.

Actually, you've got it backwards. We had laws against pornography for 180 years until some idiot judges decided that the First Amendment covered things like gay sex videos. Sorry, but once a noble idea like the First Amendment is expanded to protecting disgusting obscenity, it ceases to have any meaning.

But hey, enjoy watching your gay sex videos in your post-Christian totalitarian society.
47 posted on 02/14/2013 10:38:11 AM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus; Perdogg

Antoninus, great answer. I will ping this thread out. Been too busy to ping much.

Thanks to the commie ACLU and Larry Flynt, the First Amendment which never was meant to protect obscenity, now protects strip joints, women in high heels stomping on kittens on youtube, and movies of fags sodomizing each other.

Thanks, ACLU and porn producers!


66 posted on 02/14/2013 6:56:40 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Antoninus
Actually, you've got it backwards. We had laws against pornography for 180 years until some idiot judges decided that the First Amendment covered things like gay sex videos. Sorry, but once a noble idea like the First Amendment is expanded to protecting disgusting obscenity, it ceases to have any meaning.

THANK YOU!!!!

71 posted on 02/14/2013 7:49:56 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson