Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
-- Please point out a law that prohibited the use of deadly force in this situation, when the perp had already used deadly force on the officers and continued to shoot at them. --

Of course resort to deadly force can be justified. That is, there is no per se prohibition on the use of deadly force. The laws that pertain to deadly force describe the circumstances that justify its use. Outside of warfare, I know of no law, either statutory, common law decision, or restatement, that justifies government resort to arson as the means of deadly force.

234 posted on 02/14/2013 12:43:08 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Outside of warfare, I know of no law, either statutory, common law decision, or restatement, that justifies government resort to arson as the means of deadly force.

Really.

Please show laws that proscribe the manner of deadly force (gun, nightstick, etc.)

You are raising an absurd standard.

235 posted on 02/14/2013 12:46:01 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson