Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Outside of warfare, I know of no law, either statutory, common law decision, or restatement, that justifies government resort to arson as the means of deadly force.

Really.

Please show laws that proscribe the manner of deadly force (gun, nightstick, etc.)

You are raising an absurd standard.

235 posted on 02/14/2013 12:46:01 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
-- Please show laws that proscribe the manner of deadly force (gun, nightstick, etc.)
You are raising an absurd standard.
--

I think you meant "prescribe," which is to list what is allowed. "Proscribe" is a prohibition. Not meaning to nitpick or attempt to put you in a bad light. Maybe you just made a typo, but mixing "prescribe" and "proscribe" is not uncommon.

As far as means of deadly force that are forbidden, I submit the eighth amendment. I submit that "burning" is a form of cruel and unusual punishment, under US law. Plus, burning is a fairly slow way to disable an attacker, and unless trapped in a building, is an unreliable way to prevent escape. Firearms, bow and arrow, spear, sword, hammer, axe, baseball bat, and other devices deliver more immediate results.

I think the burden is on the police, if they do admit resorting to arson, to justify that resort.

242 posted on 02/14/2013 1:02:39 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson