Posted on 02/13/2013 5:12:34 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron
LOS ANGELES (AP) -- There was no question. The man standing before Rick Heltebrake on a rural mountain road was Christopher Dorner. Clad in camouflage from head to toe and wearing a bulletproof vest packed with ammunition, the most wanted man in America over the last week was just a few feet away, having emerged from a grove of trees holding a large, assault-style rifle.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
List YOUR approved sources for all to see. What is your link supposed to support?
What are “ unconfirmed audio clips”?
It’s an endearing term. Bless You child. :^)
LOL! You've got to be kidding!
Is Nick on your list of approved sources? LOL!
It was fun. I got a hoot out of it.
What are "unconfirmed audio clips"? Things produced by Alex Jones or Christopher Bollyn?
Heard it before, remember Waco?
They burned him down dude. That SOB wasn’t going anywhere. Let’s leave it at that.
The law only allows deadly force if a person’s life is in *immanent* danger. The cops were not in immanent danger. Regardless of what you believe to be the case, killing a suspect under these circumstances was illegal. It doesn’t matter what you think of the guy or what you believe to be his crimes, the job of the police is to bring a suspect in for trial not to exact revenge for their fallen comrades.
Actually I think he set the fire himself, the cops were trying to put out the fire. </David Koresh>
Except if you happen to be an LEO?
I didn’t just kill LEO’s and their children.
Try again HR.
The word is "imminent" and anytime you are in a gun battle/firefight, you are in imminent danger.
Especially disconcerting when the way that people "know" the accused is guilty is often the selfsame media which can't tell the color of the sky above and the grass below with accuracy on any given day.
If these are the ones to whip the mob to a frenzy to call for blood and justify the star-chamber vengeance mobs under colour of law, we are in grave danger indeed.
I don't know that Dorner wrote or did any of what he has been accused of, and we will not ever see any of that contested in a court of law. All I "know" is what has been alleged and what the media said.
As far as video goes, I saw California slide into the ocean (2012), New York freeze over (some other stupid movie), and space alien weapons carve up a Burke-class destroyer...
We have reached the tech level where anything, any image, any act can be faked before our very eyes, especially on lower-def "security camera footage". Without strict adherence to due process, anyone can be accused of virtually anything and hunted down faster and with more impunity than an excommunicae in the dark ages--while the masses sit in front of the very televisions which told them that person is guilty and cheer their demise.
The Circus Maximus lives.
Who claimed you did, strawman? Dorner did and law enforcement did what was necessary.
You are very close to being whacked. Comparing my freedom to that nut who killed innocents in California and had the LAPD on edge for a week and a half is ludicrous.
Explain your position. HR
You are in dire need of a remedial reading course, as apparently are more than a few others.
“Straw man”
I seriously doubt you know what that is. You took a passage from my home page. It holds true.
You have no argument. If you think you did it is gone now. Grow Up HR. God Bless.
What are “unconfirmed audio clips”? Things produced by Alex Jones or Christopher Bollyn?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.