[Tau Food]

You agree with all that? Please consider that the states said they couldn’t protect and defend the US Constitution because that is Congress’ job.... and Congress says they can’t protect and defend the US Constitution because that is the states’ job (and/or because Stalin presented online what has now been confirmed as 2 different forgeries).... and the courts say they can’t protect and defend the US Constitution because it’s nobody’s business whether the CINC is a foreign enemy combatant after all and it is either the states’ or Congress’ job. And the courts say that military officers don’t have enough vested interest because it is only their oath, the potential for losing protections under the Geneva Conventions, and (in one instance) 4 years of reservist’s pay (which the judge ruled to be less valuable than $500) which is at stake.

Maybe the Constitution contemplates that any factual disputes about qualifications should be decided by the states' electors and indirectly by the people who select the electors (nowadays the voters).

[butterdezillion]

Nobody within the electoral system or any state court can compel the production of a candidate’s records. Hawaii can refuse to honor subpoenas from other states.

And the system won’t even demand records. We’ve gone through how many state ballot appeals and NOBODY would require legal documents to be provided.

And the HI state registrar has indirectly confirmed that they CAN’T provide any legally probative records, because what they’ve got is legally non-valid. The White House image was forged to hide that fact.