He'd first have to be convicted by this House of Reps.
And then Obama gets to replace him. Yeah, right.
Get a grip. You really think that would happen?
FReegards!
What a mess.
If this is true, that he circumvented Irish law and thereby violated international treaties on international adoption, then he could be impeached and his decisions might even be vacated.
Unfortunately, we have a communist president, and the Senate is dominated by communists, so we may end up even worse in the end.
He'd first have to be convicted by this House of Reps.
And then Obama gets to replace him. Yeah, right.
Get a grip. You really think that would happen?
FReegards!
“If this is true, that he circumvented Irish law and thereby violated international treaties on international adoption, then he could be impeached and his decisions might even be vacated.”
If anyone’s going to persue what you have said above, it will be the ‘rats.
Once Roberts is removed, Obama will have free reign to install a leftist as his new “personal chief justice”.
Perhaps Ann Lander’s famous question needs to be asked:
Are we better off with Justice Roberts, or without him?
With him, we at least have a marginal conservative filling that seat. One who may or may not be pressured, depending on the case.
Without him…. ?????
This story probably “has legs”, if the media truly wants to investigate. The facts are there to be uncovered, even if that requires “a price”.
Perhaps if Roberts issues too many anti-Obama rulings, “the one” may finally put his foot down and issue the media their marching orders.
In that case, the country may end up with “the without him” scenario...