Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Proud Canadian

I’m a bit skeptical that what’s in this report indicates to the possibility of China attacking Japan. What use are multi-mile long columns of tanks and artillery in what would be a purely naval conflict? You aren’t going to land those sorts of forces on the miserable little rocks that are the Senkakus.


30 posted on 02/10/2013 1:09:39 PM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyanExile
I believe the author assumes a Chinese attack on the Senkakus are an attack on Japan.

I don't know what China has in mind, but it wouldn't take much to land a battalion of Chinese marines. I think some aircraft from the mainland have the combat radius to reach the islands. Chinese subs and surface ships could form a cordon around the landing force. I don't know if there is enough flat land to build an airstrip, maybe that's what all the "survey ships" are doing there. Land the marines, build a strip, base some fighters, and its all over.

The question is, what will the US do. The US is treaty bound to support the Japanese claim on these islands, not that that means anything. So far, all Obama has done is to park the carriers in their home ports for "budgetary reasons".

32 posted on 02/10/2013 3:45:31 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson