Posted on 02/09/2013 5:43:43 PM PST by Dick Bachert
Today is Saturday, February 9, 2013. As this is written, police in California are hunting former officer Christopher Dorner who has gone on a murderous rampage. He left behind a long “manifesto” setting out a list of perceived insults, indignities and slights going back to his childhood and threatening to kill those his disturbed mind feels to be responsible.
While watching FNN this morning, a psychiatrist declared that all the evidence points to this fellow being a NARCISSIST. He offered that one of the major symptoms of narcissism is an unwarranted elevated sense of great self-worth/self-esteem. He then predicted that this disorder will almost certainly lead this man to continue until he is stopped and/or killed and, if cornered, will probably present himself for “suicide by cop.”
During the early days of Obama’s emergence as a candidate for the White House, Dr. Sam Vaknin, who has written extensively on the subject of narcissism, penned several articles describing Obama not as merely a narcissist, but a malignant narcissist. Thanks to his low-information victimhood welfare, angry feral adolescent constituents (not to mention massive vote fraud), Obama won not one, but two terms as the head of this nation. (The topics of his never having been properly vetted and constitutional INeligibility are subjects for another day.)
Let me connect those dots.
Like Dorner, Obama has frequently voiced and written about slights and indignities going back to his childhood.
Like Dorner, Obama has voiced and written that he holds America and the system of capitalism as responsible for those slights and indignities.
Unlike Dorner, until Congress or the Article 3 courts step in and stop him, Obama’s actions so far (destruction of the economy, ongoing weakening of our defenses) should tell any sane adult that he is hell bent on taking the America and the system he hates into a situation where suicide not by cop but by China, Russia, Islam (etc.) is a growing reality.
As further evidence, I offer his recent failure to act in the murders of 4 Americans in Benghazi.
Panetta’s Senate testimony revealed that Obama was MIA as that tragedy unfolded. After disingenuously telling Panetta to “do what you need to do,” in an act reminiscent of his voting “Present” throughout his protectively pusillanimous state and national senate tenures, Obama stepped out of the loop.
The problem for Panetta – who may well have been in on the charade – was that only the President may give the cross border authority to permit troops to cross the borders of other nations. If Panetta was not in on the scam and given Obama’s proclivity for hanging folks out to dry, he could have been in serious trouble if the operation went south after a rescue team went in.
If you’re wondering about the use of terms like “charade” and “scam,” let me lay it out for any conspiracy buffs reading this.
Obama’s MIA status on 9/11/2012 lends great weight to this scenario:
Obama had arranged a backdoor deal with the muslim brotherhood (I refuse to capitalize any terms connected to islam) to KIDNAP the Ambassador and his small security team. Obama – who is about as with the psyches and ethos of our military people as he is with the concepts of personal honor, truth and integrity, failed to understand that those SEALS (although, as I understand the insane State Department rules, their primary mission is security of DOCUMENTS) refused orders to “stand down” and WERE NOT GOING DOWN WITHOUT A FIGHT! And fought they did – for 7 hours -- as they waited in vain for relief to arrive.
The object of the charade? To arrange a prisoner swap of our 4 muslim brotherhood captives for the Blind Sheik and unnamed other US combatant prisoners. Obama could then curry added favor with his muzzie buds over there and play the strutting macho hero with his low-information, low IQ, angry feral adolescent constituents over here, further enhancing his November re-election bid. Given the ignorance among his moronic supporters and the vote stealing machine in place to ensure a second term, he needn’t have bothered.
As with so many government related events in my lifetime, we will probably never know the truth of any of this. That said, here is one truth you can take to the bank – although you’d be wise to simply stuff in under your mattress: Unless and until this guy is removed from the White House in cuffs and leg irons, we are in SERIOUS TROUBLE! Let me wrap this with a cautionary note to any sane adults left in the GOP “leadership”:
Many of us have the well-founded sense that you believe that your refusal to challenge this guy would lead to loss of the cushy elected positions many of you hold -- basically trading the last vestige of any remaining honor for a mess of pottage -- and civil and racially based conflict between his low-information constituents and those few of us who understand that the Constitution is NOT just the name of the newspaper in Atlanta. You really need to throw into the equation that your failure to act will allow him to further advance his Marxist anti-American agenda and, when the inevitable pushback by the patriot community DOES occur, it will make what might happen now look like a picnic in the park.
(Permission to use any portion or this entire commentary if attribution given to the author. Like John Hancock—and unlike most of the Pubbies in Congress – I want our new “king” to know exactly who we are and how we feel.)
Greatness comes from those who run to the battle which others brought on, not wait-n-see what risks it may pose for you personally or politically.
So does bankruptcy.
Is this the hill I want to die on?
Actually, there are. Just not very many. Jim DeMint is one, IMO. Now there's a guy who voluntarily gave up his "cushy elected position" to join an organization that he believes may truly be capable of advancing conservatism in America. As a senator, he royally pissed off the "leadership" (ie., the establishment GOP) by starting a PAC specifically for promoting tea party candidates.
I am hoping he runs for president.
I have felt this for some time now...from the beginning . Then there WAS all this talk about whether Obama would release the guy. I was certain that this was his plan. Why else not do everything in your power to save your own appointed ambassador and be the hero? It was too obvious for many to believe. But, I say it is the real reason. He was certain that Stevens would just be kidnapped, according to plan. Since it didn’t work that way, now it is the standard democrat standoff from giving information, denials, threats, you name it. Was Stevens running guns? I’m certain of that, too. Way too many people have testified that he was, not to mention that the guy Stevens met with was also involved.
Indeed.
That dunce couldn't engineer a bowel movement.
I remember reading that theory in a thread here shortly after the Benghazi debacle. There was also another interesting theory that the whole charade was a ploy to get weaponry into the hands of the dissidents, which I tend to buy more easily.
A "prisoner swap" would have constituted "negotiating with terrorists" and Ubama would never have gotten away with it. On the other hand, Ubama likely had some other scenario in mind that would have enabled him to play the part of the "strong, competent leader in the face of national crisis" that would have made him "look presidential" and helped him mightily in the election. It is NEVER a coincidence when major crisis events like Benghazi happen in the months just prior to a big election.
By the way, no way was Ubama comfortable that his Chicago mob's vote fraud operation was enough to ensure his re-election. Ubama was desperately worried about turnout for Mittens, turnout that mysteriously didn't happen - - or maybe it did happen but was erased piecemeal in a strategic fashion by Ubama's vote fraud operation. (There's a reason the rats fight tooth and nail against any and all efforts to bring integrity and transparency to the election system.)
When the whole ploy went south and four Americans were killed, the administration came up with the "video done it" lie. Make no mistake - - the Ubama regime is the most dangerous and corrupt admionistration in history. Ubama is a terminal cancer, and if America is not already dead and gone (arguable) then it is gasping for air and struggling to cough up the malignant tumor and catch its breath.
Good luck, America.
bkmk for later
Add names Dodd and Frank to that indictment list.....
All that matters is it’s my hill.
Was Christopher Dorner raised by a single mom?
Dam nice fish though.
By the way what's for dinner, did I tell you I like fish. :-)
look the jackass went to college, he was a captain in the reserve, you gotta have college for that. nobody is married these days, esp in CA. I do more paternity cases than divorces. psychologists have convinced people if they are not “happy” they can get divorced and be happy and nothing could be further from the truth. Divorce compounds the family’s problems and the kids bear the brunt of it.
I do not know what this world is coming to but I believe most people are evil and you cannot even tell what anyone else is thinking, they could smile at you and kill you the next second
I’d also recommend joining me and others in not capitalizing the name of barry-the-usurper. Capitalize the office, it deserves respect. he does not.
Nice fish!!!
I would go with witness elimination rather than kidnapping in tha ambassador’s case. for several reasons. The first is that obama and his henchmen were never in doubt of winning the 2012 election. They had both the Establishment Republican Party and the national media in their corner. In addition to that, they knew that the same traitors, fools,self hating Whites, and parasites that put them in office in 2008 would return them to power in 2012. The second reason is that the ambassador could possibily cause both obama and Hillary some embarassment on down the road. He knew where the bodies were buried. He knew some of their secrets. Both obama and Hillary adhere to the old,”Dead men tell no tales”, school of thought.
I been doing that since 2008.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.