Years ago, in 2007/2008 I posted copiously on the fact that the US pre-census and census data was taken from the Commerce Department and placed under the administrative conrol absolute of the White House.
The 2008 census data included the GPS longitude and latitude of the location of each residence within 60 feet, read by a GPS unit of each census worker ( I ran mine off several times, and refused to cooperate at all with the establishment of the data base or the census, indicating they needed a search warrant to come into my property with a GPS device).
Everybody laughed sat me, saying , you can get that data from Google. But then people did not understand that Google data used by the government is reviewable, people would know if it was being used by the government and how they were using it from the dtat trails left by access. Now the data can be used by the president without any review. He has used the census data as a basis for his own network of community organizing, locating physical sites for individuals who support or oppose his political party or policies.And we have no way of even knowing what the census data and its GPS data is now being messaged or used.It has definitely gone far beyong the ordinary use of census data to establish and verify electoral districting or representation by population distribution.The Census has gone from being scientific to being used to achieve and sustain dictatorial political power.The dtata was likely used in Obama’s community organizing for the Nov. 2012 election, Republican pundits were blindsided in their preditions because the use of this computer based community organizing system based likely on census data had never been used before. (The cheat also went in, and many electoral districts across the nation had voters turning out for Obama at a rate of 114%, so how did the White House census data base work to bring that about?
The GPS data alone allows federal authorities to circumvent local law enforcement to locate any individual they would want, without warrant.Federal enforcement action is therefore possible to conceal from state level security administrations. People could actually just disappear.
Also the GPS data could be used to program a drone strike, and Obama already feels he does not need any review authority before using the drone program to kill a US Citizen.
As a People we are on the brink of losing the freedom for which our Constitution stands. The 2008 census GPS data base at the White House should be destroyed.No good can come of it, as Maxine Waters has so naively pointed out.
Obama is not planning on stepping down at all in 2016.I still believe he is a fascist of the first water.And he has just begun to stretch his muscle. Congress must oppose him , impeach him, or destroy him. And the GOP has not yet even begun to figure it out.
They didn't really need the White House census data base to pull off a 114% turnout for Obama, although that data base surely could have helped. Same goes for the obviously fraudulent reporting of ZERO votes for Romney in some urban election districts in Philadelphia and Cleveland, for example. There are simply no complete shutouts in elections this side of the Soviet Union.
How is it possible to record a 114% turnout for Zero in a particular district? One method would be multiple voting by the same individual: for instance, the same individual could vote absentee by mail and vote in person, even vote in person several times under different names, since, without voter ID cards, there is little to interfere with such a scheme, and early voting over a week or two period affords more opportunities for it.
Organize a dedicated group to actually register under a variety of names and addresses, and you can see how you can come up with a phony 114% vote for your candidate.
Consider the case of a black female poll worker in Cincinnati, who admitted not only to voting absentee and in person herself, but for a bunch of friends and relatives as well. (This story was reported by John Fund.) When interviewed by the media (a video of such an interview was presented on Sean Hannity's TV show the other night), she told of what she did as with arrogance and pride, and with no hint of remorse for violating the law. Law? What law? That's because only a tiny relative handful of vote fraudsters ever face any repercussions for their criminal behavior. Multiply her activity by hundreds and thousands of similar individuals doing similar things in the swing states and you can see how the outcome of a presidential election can be reversed from what it really was without the fraud and cheating. That's the main reason why GOP pundits were blindsided - not the sudden rise of the Hispanic voters and the demographic change theory that the MSM has been promulgating.
Moral of the story: unless vital changes in election procedures are introduced to counter this fraud and cheating, the GOP may never be able to win back the White House again!