On the youtube link given in the thread article at 39:30 John Guandolo says that “Roger” in “Zero Dark Thirty” is Mike (Michael) D’Andrea, not Brennan. Guandolo adds that D’Andrea “converted back out of Islam” and divorced his Muslim wife. Trento that D’Andrea converted to marry a Muslim woman and converted back after he divorced her.
The Skype video and the audio on the 2 hr and 50 min youtube are our of synch, at least on my system, so it was hard to follow.
On the following link the audio and video match and the revelation of D’Andrea’s name is at 38:00.
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/52778
I did a search on “Mike D’Andrea CIA” and all I got was a link to a bakery with a review with a curious declaration:
https://foursquare.com/v/colarussos-bakery/4c4c9ef7f5afa593a96845d6
“The Culinary Institute of America December 7, 2012
“CIA Alumnus Michael D’Andrea is working here!”
It seems that an attempt to smear John Guandolo is already underway by dredging up the events that supposedly occurred around the time of his departure from the FBI when he is alleged to have had an affair with a witness in the Rep. Jefferson case (bucks in the freezer) while he was undercover as a driver.
Here are some links some of which are fair and some rabid:
“FBI kept quiet about sexual relationship between agent, star witness in Jefferson trial”
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2009/09/post_4.html
“FBI late to link ‘Lori M.’ with agent in Jefferson case”
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/09/fbi_late_to_identify_lori_m_in.html
“Gaffney On Ex-FBI Agent Who Slept With Witness: He Was Fired For Opposing Sharia!”
“The Strange Case Of The Philandering, Muslim-Threat-Hyping FBI Agent”
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/the_strange_case_of_the_philandering_fbi_agent.php
Article III, Section 3, Paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the United States:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them,
or, in adhering to their Enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
The "aid and comfort" prong of treason has been interpreted
by SCOTUS as requiring proof of four elements:
1. an intent to betray the United States (which can be inferred from);
2. an overt act;
3. witnessed by two people; and
4. that provides aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States.
Thanks for the info. My computer doesn’t have the driver for the speaker so I can’t hear anything.
I’ve met Guandolo and I thought he was a straight up guy, and even if he slept with a witness, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!