Brent Bozell is a conservative and a good guy but I always see him as too old school for the politics/campaigns these days.
Not in his principles or convictions but in his method.
Look at the way Media Matters does it: A Republican says something questionable, let alone foolish or objectionable, and MM and the Dems pour the coals of hell on the guy (or especially on the gals) for a month straight.
When Scarborough or Rove or one of the leftists creates some sickening lie about a conservative candidate, Bozell’s tactic is to go on Hannity, replay the smear and then joke and protest a bit about how unfair it is.
As I say I appreciate Bozell and he’s a workhorse. But the Breitbart people seem to realize that we are in a war here, and the other side wants America to lose.
If we want any of this to make a difference, in the event that America survives Obama’s new “flexibility”, we need to work on making it impossible to steal an election. That’s all that matters at this point - not the people who vote but the people who count the votes.
2008 was a coup and 2012 was stolen. Sure, the PR stuff can try to keep an election from being close enough to be stolen, but as long as we’ve got the 47% voting for their sugar-daddy the vote is going to be close enough to steal. IIRC it’s something like 5-6 percentage points we have to be ahead by, in order for the gap to be insulated from voting theft.
Bozell has been fighting to get broadcast time for decades until FNC came along.
To understand how much the MSM must hate Bozell, just look at how they treated Reed Irvine and Accuracy In Media (AIM) during the 1980s and 1990s. I recall wathing the Nightline round-tables back then when Ted Koppel would have Irvine in the audience only to mock him when he went to the microphone to ask a question of the panel.
-PJ