Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
Every Raven should have been holding on that play. The penalty for holding in the end zone is a safety.

Really? That doesn't make any sense. Why wouldn't every defense hold on every goal line third down play?

720 posted on 02/03/2013 8:05:03 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies ]


To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Because part of the penalty for defensive holding is an automatic 1st down. Turning a 3rd and goal into a 1st and goal isn’t good. This play was a unique case where a hold creates exactly the desired result, punter doesn’t get hit, time runs off the clock, and they get the safety to move the kick to the 20 instead of the 8.


727 posted on 02/03/2013 8:07:30 PM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Because that wouldn’t help. You’d give them half the distance and another shot. Eventually they might score.

This trick only works when you are the offense, trying to run out the clock. If you can afford a 10-yard holding penalty, you can trade that 10 yards for the extra 5-10 seconds you get off the clock.

And in this case, it was a 4th-down play where they were giving up a safety anyway. A holding penalty would have resulted in a safety, which is what they were getting anyway. So by holding, they just allowed more seconds to run off the clock.

(I’d have to check the rule book to see if, because it was a safety anyway, the defensive team had the choice of taking the penalty on the ensuing kickoff, but even that would just mean 10 yards on a kick).


769 posted on 02/03/2013 9:19:44 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson